XIDV vs. RODM
XIDV (Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - XIDV tracks the VettaFi New Frontier International Dividend Select Index while RODM tracks the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XIDV returned 27.41% vs 23.44% for RODM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XIDV charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.
Performance
XIDV vs. RODM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIDV achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly higher than RODM's 9.64% return.
XIDV
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 27.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RODM
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- 9.64%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 23.44%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
XIDV vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF | 10.22% | 40.30% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 9.64% | 31.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIDV and RODM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025 | 0.89 |
The correlation between XIDV and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
XIDV vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XIDV
RODM
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
XIDV
RODM
Energy
XIDV
RODM
Consumer Cyclical
XIDV
RODM
Consumer Defensive
XIDV
RODM
Industrials
XIDV
RODM
Basic Materials
XIDV
RODM
Utilities
XIDV
RODM
Communication Services
XIDV
RODM
Healthcare
XIDV
RODM
Real Estate
XIDV
RODM
Technology
XIDV
RODM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIDV vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank
XIDV
RODM
XIDV vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XIDV | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.39 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 3.32 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 13.27 | -1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XIDV | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 2.17 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.55 | 0.51 | +2.05 |
Drawdowns
XIDV vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIDV drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIDV and RODM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIDV | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -35.98% | +23.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.25% | -7.10% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -2.62% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -6.38% | +4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 1.77% | +0.51% |
Volatility
XIDV vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison
Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.20%. This indicates that XIDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIDV | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 3.20% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 8.60% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.33% | 10.85% | +1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 13.45% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 15.24% | -0.44% |
XIDV vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIDV has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
XIDV vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison
XIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than RODM's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.84% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF | 4.32% | 4.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIDV and RODM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XIDV has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to RODM (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIDV dropped -12.15% vs RODM's -35.98%.
On 1-year performance, XIDV leads with 27.41% vs 23.44% for RODM. On fees, XIDV is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XIDV has performed better with a 27.41% return vs 23.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XIDV is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.
XIDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 2.84% for RODM.
XIDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier International Dividend Select Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XIDV and 0.29% for RODM.
XIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XIDV and RODM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer