XIDV vs. CIL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

XIDV (Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - XIDV tracks the VettaFi New Frontier International Dividend Select Index while CIL tracks the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XIDV returned 29.55% vs 17.86% for CIL. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XIDV charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.

Performance

XIDV vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIDV achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return.

XIDV

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.26%
• YTD: 12.22%
• 6M: 12.95%
• 1Y: 29.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 5.93%
• 1Y: 17.86%
• 3Y*: 15.96%
• 5Y*: 7.59%
• 10Y*: 8.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIDV vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF	12.22%	40.77%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	29.36%

Correlation

The correlation between XIDV and CIL is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025	0.72

The correlation between XIDV and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XIDV vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XIDV	CIL
Financial Services	32.6%	24.8%
Energy	11.3%	4.6%
Industrials	9.5%	18.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	8.5%	8.8%
Basic Materials	8.0%	6.6%
Utilities	6.9%	6.6%
Communication Services	5.5%	5.8%
Healthcare	5.2%	7.7%
Real Estate	2.1%	2.2%
Technology	0.9%	6.4%

Return for Risk

XIDV vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIDV

XIDV Risk / Return Rank: 75
XIDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
XIDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XIDV Omega Ratio Rank: 76
XIDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
XIDV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 84
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIDV vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XIDV	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.44	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	3.57	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.56	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	4.06	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.96	17.66	-4.70

XIDV vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIDV and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XIDV vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIDV drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIDV and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	XIDV	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.15%	-36.27%	+24.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.25%	-4.60%	-3.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.96%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.65%	-0.58%	-1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.40%	-6.53%	+5.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	1.07%	+1.22%

Volatility

XIDV vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that XIDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XIDV	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	0.00%	+3.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.32%	3.38%	+6.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.55%	7.68%	+4.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.77%	16.47%	-1.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.77%	17.08%	-2.31%

XIDV vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIDV has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

XIDV vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

XIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than CIL's 1.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	1.20%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF	1.86%	4.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XIDV and CIL in my portfolio?

XIDV and CIL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XIDV or CIL?

XIDV has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIDV dropped -12.15% vs CIL's -36.27%.

Which ETF is better, XIDV or CIL?

On 1-year performance, XIDV leads with 29.55% vs 17.86% for CIL. On fees, XIDV is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XIDV or CIL?

Over the 1-year period, XIDV has performed better with a 29.55% return vs 17.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XIDV or CIL?

XIDV is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XIDV or CIL?

XIDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.20% for CIL.

What is the main difference between XIDV and CIL?

XIDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier International Dividend Select Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XIDV and 0.45% for CIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.