XIDV vs. ISCMF
XIDV (Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XIDV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the VettaFi New Frontier International Dividend Select Index, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XIDV returned 27.53% vs 22.55% for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.
Performance
XIDV vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIDV achieves a 13.30% return, which is significantly higher than ISCMF's 11.96% return.
XIDV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- YTD
- 13.30%
- 1Y
- 27.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.88%
- 6M
- 11.96%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XIDV vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF | 13.30% | 40.77% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 11.96% | 12.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIDV and ISCMF is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIDV vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
XIDV
ISCMF
XIDV vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XIDV | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.89 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 1.77 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.52 | 7.87 | +3.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XIDV vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIDV drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIDV and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIDV | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -25.42% | +13.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.25% | -13.68% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -13.68% | +12.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.43% | -13.31% | +11.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 3.08% | -0.73% |
Volatility
XIDV vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) is 3.77%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) has a volatility of 9.30%. This indicates that XIDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIDV | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 9.30% | -5.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.48% | 18.12% | -7.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.65% | 19.62% | -6.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 14.84% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 14.84% | -0.19% |
XIDV vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XIDV and ISCMF have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XIDV vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
XIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF | 6.02% | 4.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIDV and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISCMF has higher volatility (9.30%) compared to XIDV (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIDV dropped -12.15% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.
On 1-year performance, XIDV leads with 27.53% vs 22.55% for ISCMF. Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. On volatility, XIDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XIDV has performed better with a 27.53% return vs 22.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XIDV and ISCMF have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.
XIDV has the higher dividend yield at 6.02%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
XIDV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. XIDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier International Dividend Select Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares.
XIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XIDV and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer