XIDV vs. FDT
XIDV (Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF) and FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - XIDV tracks the VettaFi New Frontier International Dividend Select Index while FDT tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XIDV returned 27.41% vs 45.78% for FDT. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XIDV charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDT.
Performance
XIDV vs. FDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIDV achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 19.01% return.
XIDV
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 27.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDT
- 1D
- -4.71%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 21.30%
- 1Y
- 45.78%
- 3Y*
- 27.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
XIDV vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF | 10.22% | 40.30% |
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 19.01% | 47.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIDV and FDT is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025 | 0.79 |
The correlation between XIDV and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
XIDV vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XIDV
FDT
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
XIDV
FDT
Energy
XIDV
FDT
Consumer Cyclical
XIDV
FDT
Consumer Defensive
XIDV
FDT
Industrials
XIDV
FDT
Basic Materials
XIDV
FDT
Utilities
XIDV
FDT
Communication Services
XIDV
FDT
Healthcare
XIDV
FDT
Real Estate
XIDV
FDT
Technology
XIDV
FDT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIDV vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank
XIDV
FDT
XIDV vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XIDV | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.44 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 3.43 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 13.29 | -1.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XIDV | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 2.41 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.55 | 0.38 | +2.18 |
Drawdowns
XIDV vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIDV drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIDV and FDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIDV | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -46.10% | +33.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.25% | -13.41% | +5.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -6.68% | +3.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -10.77% | +9.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 3.45% | -1.17% |
Volatility
XIDV vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) is 3.64%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that XIDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIDV | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 8.24% | -4.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 16.69% | -6.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.33% | 19.06% | -6.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 18.35% | -3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 18.58% | -3.78% |
XIDV vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIDV has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
XIDV vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison
XIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than FDT's 2.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.99% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF | 4.32% | 4.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIDV and FDT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDT has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to XIDV (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIDV dropped -12.15% vs FDT's -46.10%.
On 1-year performance, FDT leads with 45.78% vs 27.41% for XIDV. On fees, XIDV is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XIDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FDT has performed better with a 45.78% return vs 27.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XIDV is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
XIDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 2.99% for FDT.
XIDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier International Dividend Select Index, while FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XIDV and 0.80% for FDT.
FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XIDV and FDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer