XIDV vs. EPIN
XIDV (Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF) and EPIN (Harbor International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. XIDV is passively managed, while EPIN is actively managed. Over the past year, XIDV returned 30.00% vs 34.90% for EPIN. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XIDV charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for EPIN.
Performance
XIDV vs. EPIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIDV achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly lower than EPIN's 21.71% return.
XIDV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 13.02%
- YTD
- 14.75%
- 1Y
- 30.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPIN
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- 6M
- 14.51%
- YTD
- 21.71%
- 1Y
- 34.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XIDV vs. EPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF | 14.75% | 15.81% |
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF | 21.71% | 14.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIDV and EPIN is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.72 |
The correlation between XIDV and EPIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
XIDV vs. EPIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XIDV
EPIN
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
Financial Services
XIDV
EPIN
Energy
XIDV
EPIN
Consumer Defensive
XIDV
EPIN
Industrials
XIDV
EPIN
Consumer Cyclical
XIDV
EPIN
Basic Materials
XIDV
EPIN
Utilities
XIDV
EPIN
-
Healthcare
XIDV
EPIN
Communication Services
XIDV
EPIN
Real Estate
XIDV
EPIN
-
Technology
XIDV
EPIN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIDV vs. EPIN — Risk / Return Rank
XIDV
EPIN
XIDV vs. EPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) and Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XIDV | EPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.33 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 3.01 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.84 | 11.10 | +1.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XIDV vs. EPIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIDV drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, roughly equal to the maximum EPIN drawdown of -11.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIDV and EPIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIDV | EPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -11.64% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.25% | -11.64% | +3.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.78% | +3.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -1.84% | +0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 3.15% | -0.81% |
Volatility
XIDV vs. EPIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) is 3.06%, while Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that XIDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIDV | EPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 5.63% | -2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 16.97% | -6.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | 19.04% | -6.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 18.47% | -3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 18.47% | -3.87% |
XIDV vs. EPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIDV has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EPIN's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
XIDV vs. EPIN - Dividend Comparison
XIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than EPIN's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF | 0.65% | 0.79% |
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF | 5.95% | 4.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIDV and EPIN have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPIN has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to XIDV (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIDV dropped -12.15% vs EPIN's -11.64%.
On 1-year performance, EPIN leads with 34.90% vs 30.00% for XIDV. On fees, XIDV is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XIDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EPIN has performed better with a 34.90% return vs 30.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XIDV is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for EPIN.
XIDV has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 0.65% for EPIN.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XIDV and 0.80% for EPIN.
XIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XIDV and EPIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer