XHS vs. PBPH
XHS (SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XHS tracks the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XHS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
XHS vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHS achieves a 25.67% return, which is significantly higher than PBPH's 6.41% return.
XHS
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- 6M
- 24.75%
- YTD
- 25.67%
- 1Y
- 52.87%
- 3Y*
- 13.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.70%
PBPH
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.66M | $2.41M | $3.76M | |
| $3.18M | $3.55M | $3.01M |
XHS vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 25.67% | -1.58% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 6.41% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHS and PBPH is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHS vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
XHS
PBPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XHS vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XHS | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.51 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XHS vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHS drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHS and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHS | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.32% | -11.10% | -28.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -4.20% | +1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.10% | -4.04% | -6.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | — | — |
Volatility
XHS vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHS | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.51% | 17.86% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.24% | 17.86% | +3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 17.86% | +4.56% |
XHS vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHS vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
XHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, more than PBPH's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 0.20% | 0.27% | 0.38% | 0.23% | 0.19% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 2.37% | 0.34% | 0.22% | 0.28% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHS and PBPH have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHS.
XHS has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.
XHS tracks S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHS and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for XHS and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer