PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHS vs. PBPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHS vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHS achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly higher than PBPH's -1.13% return.


XHS

1D
0.28%
1M
2.77%
YTD
6.32%
6M
5.39%
1Y
16.58%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
0.44%
10Y*
7.46%

PBPH

1D
0.58%
1M
0.07%
YTD
-1.13%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHS vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XHS and PBPH is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHS vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHS
XHS Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
XHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHS Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
XHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHS Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

PBPH
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHS vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHSPBPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.83

XHS vs. PBPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHSPBPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

-0.04

+0.61

Drawdowns

XHS vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHS drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHS and PBPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHSPBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.32%

-11.10%

-28.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-8.69%

+6.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.20%

-4.23%

-5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

Volatility

XHS vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHSPBPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.56%

16.78%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.10%

16.78%

+4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.40%

16.78%

+5.62%

XHS vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

XHS vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison

XHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, more than PBPH's 0.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBPH
Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF
0.09%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XHS
SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF
0.25%0.27%0.38%0.23%0.19%0.20%0.23%2.37%0.34%0.22%0.28%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHS and PBPH have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHS.

XHS has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.

XHS tracks S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHS and 0.13% for PBPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHS and PBPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer