PBPH vs. IBBQ
PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) and IBBQ (Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index while IBBQ tracks the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBPH charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IBBQ.
Performance
PBPH vs. IBBQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBPH achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly lower than IBBQ's 14.59% return.
PBPH
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 6.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBBQ
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 13.22%
- YTD
- 14.59%
- 1Y
- 47.23%
- 3Y*
- 17.54%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- —
PBPH vs. IBBQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 6.92% | 0.74% |
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 14.59% | 0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBPH and IBBQ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBPH vs. IBBQ — Risk / Return Rank
PBPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBBQ
PBPH vs. IBBQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH) and Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBPH | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.69 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.91 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBPH vs. IBBQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBPH drawdown since its inception was -11.10%, smaller than the maximum IBBQ drawdown of -37.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBPH and IBBQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBPH | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.10% | -37.94% | +26.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.74% | -5.09% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.14% | -16.49% | +12.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility
PBPH vs. IBBQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBPH | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.80% | 20.31% | -2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 22.01% | -4.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 21.89% | -4.09% |
PBPH vs. IBBQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBPH has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than IBBQ's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PBPH vs. IBBQ - Dividend Comparison
PBPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than IBBQ's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 0.79% | 0.90% | 1.14% | 0.81% | 0.76% | 0.63% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBPH and IBBQ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IBBQ.
IBBQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.08% for PBPH.
PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index, while IBBQ tracks Nasdaq Biotechnology Index. They also come from different issuers: Portfolio Building Block and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for PBPH and 0.19% for IBBQ.
Find the right allocation for PBPH and IBBQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer