XHS vs. GSKH

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

XHS (SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF) and GSKH (GSK plc ADRhedged ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XHS tracks the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index while GSKH tracks the GSK plc Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XHS returned 26.83% vs 39.42% for GSKH. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for GSKH.

Performance

XHS vs. GSKH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHS achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly higher than GSKH's 7.33% return.

XHS

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: 7.76%
• YTD: 14.26%
• 6M: 12.85%
• 1Y: 26.83%
• 3Y*: 10.70%
• 5Y*: 1.95%
• 10Y*: 8.36%

GSKH

• 1D: -1.73%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 7.33%
• 6M: 7.39%
• 1Y: 39.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHS vs. GSKH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF	14.26%	16.07%
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF	7.33%	36.51%

Correlation

The correlation between XHS and GSKH is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2025	0.26

Return for Risk

XHS vs. GSKH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHS

XHS Risk / Return Rank: 43
XHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
XHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
XHS Omega Ratio Rank: 42
XHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
XHS Martin Ratio Rank: 40

GSKH

GSKH Risk / Return Rank: 41
GSKH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
GSKH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
GSKH Omega Ratio Rank: 42
GSKH Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GSKH Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHS vs. GSKH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XHS	GSKH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.41	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	2.14	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.27	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	1.99	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.05	5.27	+0.78

XHS vs. GSKH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHS Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the GSKH Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHS and GSKH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XHS vs. GSKH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHS drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, which is greater than GSKH's maximum drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHS and GSKH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XHS	GSKH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.32%	-18.54%	-20.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.99%	-18.54%	+6.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-13.70%	+13.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.17%	-5.82%	-4.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.32%	6.98%	-2.66%

Volatility

XHS vs. GSKH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) is 4.59%, while GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that XHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSKH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XHS	GSKH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.59%	6.48%	-1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.23%	18.48%	-6.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.93%	26.20%	-8.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.15%	26.92%	-5.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.41%	26.92%	-4.51%

XHS vs. GSKH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GSKH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

XHS vs. GSKH - Dividend Comparison

XHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than GSKH's 2.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF	2.89%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF	0.23%	0.27%	0.38%	0.23%	0.19%	0.20%	0.23%	2.37%	0.34%	0.22%	0.28%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XHS and GSKH in my portfolio?

XHS and GSKH have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XHS or GSKH?

GSKH has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to XHS (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHS dropped -39.32% vs GSKH's -18.54%.

Which ETF is better, XHS or GSKH?

On 1-year performance, GSKH leads with 39.42% vs 26.83% for XHS. On fees, GSKH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XHS has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XHS or GSKH?

Over the 1-year period, GSKH has performed better with a 39.42% return vs 26.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XHS or GSKH?

GSKH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XHS or GSKH?

GSKH has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.23% for XHS.

What is the main difference between XHS and GSKH?

XHS tracks S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index, while GSKH tracks GSK plc Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHS and 0.19% for GSKH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.