XHLF vs. CERY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XHLF (BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and CERY (SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XHLF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index, while CERY is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XHLF returned 3.82% vs 27.40% for CERY. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. XHLF charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CERY.

Performance

XHLF vs. CERY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHLF achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than CERY's 18.11% return.

XHLF

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 6M: 1.65%
• 1Y: 3.82%
• 3Y*: 4.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CERY

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: -9.49%
• YTD: 18.11%
• 6M: 16.37%
• 1Y: 27.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHLF vs. CERY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF	1.56%	4.21%	1.49%
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	18.11%	15.68%	3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between XHLF and CERY is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	-0.09

Return for Risk

XHLF vs. CERY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHLF

XHLF Risk / Return Rank: 100
XHLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
XHLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Martin Ratio Rank: 100

CERY

CERY Risk / Return Rank: 53
CERY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
CERY Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CERY Omega Ratio Rank: 52
CERY Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
CERY Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHLF vs. CERY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XHLF	CERY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	12.04	1.78	+10.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	43.57	2.38	+41.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	10.94	1.31	+9.63
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	96.46	2.21	+94.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	639.88	10.02	+629.86

XHLF vs. CERY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHLF Sharpe Ratio is 12.04, which is higher than the CERY Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHLF and CERY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XHLF vs. CERY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHLF drawdown since its inception was -0.11%, smaller than the maximum CERY drawdown of -12.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHLF and CERY.

Drawdown Indicators

	XHLF	CERY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.11%	-12.44%	+12.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.04%	-12.44%	+12.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-12.44%	+12.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.01%	-2.29%	+2.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	2.76%	-2.75%

Volatility

XHLF vs. CERY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) is 0.09%, while SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that XHLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CERY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XHLF	CERY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.09%	3.64%	-3.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.22%	13.63%	-13.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32%	15.66%	-15.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.42%	14.74%	-14.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.42%	14.74%	-14.32%

XHLF vs. CERY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHLF has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than CERY's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

XHLF vs. CERY - Dividend Comparison

XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than CERY's 4.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	4.23%	4.99%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF	3.84%	3.98%	4.96%	4.50%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XHLF and CERY in my portfolio?

XHLF and CERY have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XHLF or CERY?

CERY has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to XHLF (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHLF dropped -0.11% vs CERY's -12.44%.

Which ETF is better, XHLF or CERY?

On 1-year performance, CERY leads with 27.40% vs 3.82% for XHLF. On fees, XHLF is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XHLF has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XHLF or CERY?

Over the 1-year period, CERY has performed better with a 27.40% return vs 3.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XHLF or CERY?

XHLF is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CERY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XHLF or CERY?

CERY has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 3.84% for XHLF.

What is the main difference between XHLF and CERY?

XHLF is categorized as Government Bonds, while CERY is Commodities. XHLF tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index, while CERY tracks Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for XHLF and 0.28% for CERY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XHLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.04 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.