XHB vs. WOOD
XHB (SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF) and WOOD (iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XHB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index, while WOOD is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XHB returned 12.86%/yr vs 5.69%/yr for WOOD. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XHB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for WOOD.
Performance
XHB vs. WOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHB achieves a 5.80% return, which is significantly higher than WOOD's -5.06% return. Over the past 10 years, XHB has outperformed WOOD with an annualized return of 12.86%, while WOOD has yielded a comparatively lower 5.69% annualized return.
XHB
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- 6M
- -3.77%
- YTD
- 5.80%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
WOOD
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- -9.58%
- YTD
- -5.06%
- 1Y
- -7.46%
- 3Y*
- -0.50%
- 5Y*
- -3.65%
- 10Y*
- 5.69%
XHB vs. WOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHB SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF | 5.80% | -0.69% | 9.87% | 60.10% | -28.93% | 49.70% | 27.97% | 41.30% | -25.73% | 31.80% |
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | -5.06% | -3.27% | -4.21% | 13.84% | -19.39% | 17.03% | 20.36% | 19.75% | -17.73% | 34.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHB and WOOD is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008 | 0.68 |
The correlation between XHB and WOOD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
XHB vs. WOOD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHB
WOOD
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
XHB
WOOD
Industrials
XHB
WOOD
-
Basic Materials
XHB
WOOD
Consumer Defensive
XHB
WOOD
-
Real Estate
XHB
WOOD
Communication Services
XHB
-
WOOD
-
Energy
XHB
-
WOOD
-
Financial Services
XHB
-
WOOD
-
Healthcare
XHB
-
WOOD
-
Technology
XHB
-
WOOD
-
Utilities
XHB
-
WOOD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHB vs. WOOD — Risk / Return Rank
XHB
WOOD
XHB vs. WOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XHB | WOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.95 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | -0.37 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.28 | -0.73 | +1.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XHB vs. WOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHB drawdown since its inception was -81.61%, which is greater than WOOD's maximum drawdown of -63.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHB and WOOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHB | WOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.61% | -63.25% | -18.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.71% | -21.64% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.53% | -22.79% | -7.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.46% | -30.71% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.57% | -50.20% | +0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.39% | -22.77% | +10.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.52% | -14.81% | -12.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.75% | 10.88% | -0.13% |
Volatility
XHB vs. WOOD - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) has a higher volatility of 10.57% compared to iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) at 5.61%. This indicates that XHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHB | WOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.57% | 5.61% | +4.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.11% | 14.57% | +7.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.63% | 18.67% | +9.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.97% | 19.74% | +8.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.53% | 21.70% | +5.83% |
XHB vs. WOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WOOD's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHB vs. WOOD - Dividend Comparison
XHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than WOOD's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | 2.49% | 2.51% | 2.09% | 1.64% | 2.26% | 1.24% | 0.98% | 1.85% | 2.82% | 1.19% | 1.65% | 2.04% |
XHB SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.59% | 0.77% | 1.06% | 0.51% | 0.73% | 0.89% | 1.25% | 0.72% | 0.67% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHB and WOOD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XHB has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to WOOD (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHB dropped -81.61% vs WOOD's -63.25%.
On 10-year performance, XHB leads with 12.86% vs 5.69% for WOOD. On fees, XHB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, WOOD has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XHB has performed better with a 12.86% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XHB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for WOOD.
WOOD has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.60% for XHB.
XHB is categorized as Building & Construction, while WOOD is Materials. XHB tracks S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index, while WOOD tracks S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHB and 0.46% for WOOD.
XHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHB and WOOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer