XHB vs. ITB
XHB (SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF) and ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) are both Building & Construction funds - XHB tracks the S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index while ITB tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XHB returned 12.86%/yr vs 13.57%/yr for ITB. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XHB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ITB.
Performance
XHB vs. ITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHB achieves a 5.80% return, which is significantly higher than ITB's 1.88% return. Over the past 10 years, XHB has underperformed ITB with an annualized return of 12.86%, while ITB has yielded a comparatively higher 13.57% annualized return.
XHB
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- 6M
- -3.77%
- YTD
- 5.80%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
ITB
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- -8.30%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- -0.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 13.57%
XHB vs. ITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHB SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF | 5.80% | -0.69% | 9.87% | 60.10% | -28.93% | 49.70% | 27.97% | 41.30% | -25.73% | 31.80% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.88% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHB and ITB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.95 |
The correlation between XHB and ITB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
XHB vs. ITB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHB
ITB
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
XHB
ITB
Industrials
XHB
ITB
Basic Materials
XHB
ITB
Consumer Defensive
XHB
ITB
-
Real Estate
XHB
ITB
Communication Services
XHB
-
ITB
-
Energy
XHB
-
ITB
-
Financial Services
XHB
-
ITB
-
Healthcare
XHB
-
ITB
-
Technology
XHB
-
ITB
-
Utilities
XHB
-
ITB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHB vs. ITB — Risk / Return Rank
XHB
ITB
XHB vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XHB | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.02 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | -0.07 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.28 | -0.13 | +0.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XHB vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHB drawdown since its inception was -81.61%, smaller than the maximum ITB drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHB and ITB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHB | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.61% | -86.53% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.71% | -26.04% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.53% | -33.35% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.46% | -40.55% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.57% | -52.10% | +2.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.39% | -22.77% | +10.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.52% | -37.02% | +9.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.75% | 13.97% | -3.22% |
Volatility
XHB vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) is 10.57%, while iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a volatility of 11.13%. This indicates that XHB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHB | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.57% | 11.13% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.11% | 22.59% | -0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.63% | 30.21% | -1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.97% | 29.51% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.53% | 30.13% | -2.60% |
XHB vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ITB's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHB vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison
XHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than ITB's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.66% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
XHB SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.59% | 0.77% | 1.06% | 0.51% | 0.73% | 0.89% | 1.25% | 0.72% | 0.67% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, XHB and ITB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ITB has higher volatility (11.13%) compared to XHB (10.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHB dropped -81.61% vs ITB's -86.53%.
On 10-year performance, ITB leads with 13.57% vs 12.86% for XHB. On fees, XHB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XHB has been the lower-risk option at 10.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITB has performed better with a 13.57% return vs 12.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XHB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ITB.
ITB has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.60% for XHB.
XHB tracks S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index, while ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHB and 0.38% for ITB.
XHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHB and ITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer