XHB vs. ITB
XHB (SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF) and ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) are both Building & Construction funds - XHB tracks the S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index while ITB tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XHB returned 13.79%/yr vs 14.54%/yr for ITB. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XHB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ITB.
Performance
XHB vs. ITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHB achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly higher than ITB's 1.44% return. Over the past 10 years, XHB has underperformed ITB with an annualized return of 13.79%, while ITB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.54% annualized return.
XHB
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 6.31%
- 6M
- 4.68%
- 1Y
- 15.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
ITB
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- 7.18%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 9.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 14.54%
XHB vs. ITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHB SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF | 6.31% | -0.69% | 9.87% | 60.10% | -28.93% | 49.70% | 27.97% | 41.30% | -25.73% | 31.80% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.44% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHB and ITB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.95 |
The correlation between XHB and ITB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
XHB vs. ITB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHB
ITB
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
XHB
ITB
Industrials
XHB
ITB
Real Estate
XHB
ITB
Basic Materials
XHB
-
ITB
Communication Services
XHB
-
ITB
-
Consumer Defensive
XHB
-
ITB
-
Energy
XHB
-
ITB
-
Financial Services
XHB
-
ITB
-
Healthcare
XHB
-
ITB
-
Technology
XHB
-
ITB
-
Utilities
XHB
-
ITB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHB vs. ITB — Risk / Return Rank
XHB
ITB
XHB vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XHB | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.08 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 0.36 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.51 | 0.68 | +0.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XHB vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHB drawdown since its inception was -81.61%, smaller than the maximum ITB drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHB and ITB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHB | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.61% | -86.53% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.71% | -26.04% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.53% | -33.35% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.46% | -40.55% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.57% | -52.10% | +2.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.97% | -23.10% | +11.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.57% | -37.06% | +9.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.60% | 13.64% | -3.04% |
Volatility
XHB vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) have volatilities of 8.50% and 8.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHB | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 8.66% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.06% | 21.41% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.44% | 30.00% | -1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.84% | 29.37% | -1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 30.10% | -2.58% |
XHB vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ITB's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHB vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison
XHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than ITB's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.66% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
XHB SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF | 0.73% | 0.78% | 0.59% | 0.77% | 1.06% | 0.51% | 0.73% | 0.89% | 1.25% | 0.72% | 0.67% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, XHB and ITB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ITB has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to XHB (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHB dropped -81.61% vs ITB's -86.53%.
On 10-year performance, ITB leads with 14.54% vs 13.79% for XHB. On fees, XHB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XHB has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITB has performed better with a 14.54% return vs 13.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XHB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ITB.
XHB has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.66% for ITB.
XHB tracks S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index, while ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHB and 0.38% for ITB.
XHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHB and ITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer