XHB vs. METU

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XHB (SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF) and METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XHB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index, while METU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. XHB is passively managed, while METU is actively managed. Over the past year, XHB returned 14.89% vs -45.28% for METU. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHB charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for METU.

Performance

XHB vs. METU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) and Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHB achieves a 4.66% return, which is significantly higher than METU's -34.42% return.

XHB

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 11.70%
• YTD: 4.66%
• 6M: 0.06%
• 1Y: 14.89%
• 3Y*: 12.84%
• 5Y*: 9.05%
• 10Y*: 13.53%

METU

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -16.47%
• YTD: -34.42%
• 6M: -31.54%
• 1Y: -45.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHB vs. METU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XHB SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF	4.66%	-0.69%	3.03%
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	-34.42%	-1.01%	28.79%

Correlation

The correlation between XHB and METU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024	0.19

XHB vs. METU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XHB	METU
Consumer Cyclical	60.5%	-
Industrials	38.4%	-
Real Estate	1.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XHB vs. METU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHB

XHB Risk / Return Rank: 17
XHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
XHB Omega Ratio Rank: 17
XHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
XHB Martin Ratio Rank: 15

METU

METU Risk / Return Rank: 4
METU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
METU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
METU Omega Ratio Rank: 4
METU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
METU Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHB vs. METU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) and Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XHB	METU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	-0.66	+1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	-0.76	+1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.90	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	-0.77	+1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.13	-1.36	+2.49

XHB vs. METU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHB Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is higher than the METU Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHB and METU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XHB vs. METU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHB drawdown since its inception was -81.61%, which is greater than METU's maximum drawdown of -61.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHB and METU.

Drawdown Indicators

	XHB	METU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.61%	-61.85%	-19.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.71%	-61.52%	+39.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.34%	-58.08%	+44.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.58%	-23.93%	-3.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.51%	34.46%	-23.95%

Volatility

XHB vs. METU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) is 9.42%, while Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a volatility of 20.46%. This indicates that XHB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XHB	METU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.42%	20.46%	-11.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.63%	54.04%	-33.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.30%	70.96%	-42.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.77%	72.35%	-44.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.47%	72.35%	-44.88%

XHB vs. METU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than METU's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

XHB vs. METU - Dividend Comparison

XHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than METU's 4.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	4.71%	3.00%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XHB SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF	0.60%	0.78%	0.59%	0.77%	1.06%	0.51%	0.73%	0.89%	1.25%	0.72%	0.67%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XHB and METU in my portfolio?

XHB and METU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XHB or METU?

METU has higher volatility (20.46%) compared to XHB (9.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHB dropped -81.61% vs METU's -61.85%.

Which ETF is better, XHB or METU?

On 1-year performance, XHB leads with 14.89% vs -45.28% for METU. On fees, XHB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XHB has been the lower-risk option at 9.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XHB or METU?

Over the 1-year period, XHB has performed better with a 14.89% return vs -45.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XHB or METU?

XHB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for METU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XHB or METU?

METU has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 0.60% for XHB.

What is the main difference between XHB and METU?

XHB is categorized as Building & Construction, while METU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHB and 1.07% for METU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.