XHB vs. IYT
XHB (SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF) and IYT (iShares Transportation Average ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XHB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index, while IYT is a Transportation Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Transportation Average Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XHB returned 13.53%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for IYT. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XHB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYT.
Performance
XHB vs. IYT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHB achieves a 4.66% return, which is significantly lower than IYT's 16.53% return. Over the past 10 years, XHB has outperformed IYT with an annualized return of 13.53%, while IYT has yielded a comparatively lower 11.08% annualized return.
XHB
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 7.49%
- YTD
- 4.66%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- 14.89%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.53%
IYT
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 7.88%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 6M
- 13.90%
- 1Y
- 34.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
XHB vs. IYT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHB SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF | 4.66% | -0.69% | 9.87% | 60.10% | -28.93% | 49.70% | 27.97% | 41.30% | -25.73% | 31.80% |
IYT iShares Transportation Average ETF | 16.53% | 11.48% | 4.10% | 24.62% | -21.74% | 26.41% | 14.20% | 20.11% | -12.87% | 18.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHB and IYT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006 | 0.70 |
The correlation between XHB and IYT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
XHB vs. IYT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHB
IYT
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
XHB
IYT
-
Industrials
XHB
IYT
Real Estate
XHB
IYT
-
Basic Materials
XHB
-
IYT
-
Communication Services
XHB
-
IYT
-
Consumer Defensive
XHB
-
IYT
-
Energy
XHB
-
IYT
-
Financial Services
XHB
-
IYT
-
Healthcare
XHB
-
IYT
-
Technology
XHB
-
IYT
Utilities
XHB
-
IYT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHB vs. IYT — Risk / Return Rank
XHB
IYT
XHB vs. IYT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) and iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XHB | IYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.27 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 2.63 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.13 | 8.56 | -7.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XHB vs. IYT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHB drawdown since its inception was -81.61%, which is greater than IYT's maximum drawdown of -60.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHB and IYT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHB | IYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.61% | -60.39% | -21.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.71% | -12.09% | -9.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.53% | -26.35% | -4.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.46% | -29.15% | -10.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.57% | -41.28% | -8.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.34% | 0.00% | -13.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.58% | -9.30% | -18.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.51% | 3.71% | +6.80% |
Volatility
XHB vs. IYT - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) has a higher volatility of 9.42% compared to iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) at 6.45%. This indicates that XHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHB | IYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.42% | 6.45% | +2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.63% | 15.94% | +4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.30% | 20.61% | +7.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.77% | 22.38% | +5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.47% | 23.18% | +4.29% |
XHB vs. IYT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IYT's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHB vs. IYT - Dividend Comparison
XHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than IYT's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYT iShares Transportation Average ETF | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.08% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 1.29% | 1.35% | 0.92% | 0.96% | 1.28% |
XHB SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.59% | 0.77% | 1.06% | 0.51% | 0.73% | 0.89% | 1.25% | 0.72% | 0.67% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHB and IYT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XHB has higher volatility (9.42%) compared to IYT (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHB dropped -81.61% vs IYT's -60.39%.
On 10-year performance, XHB leads with 13.53% vs 11.08% for IYT. On fees, XHB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IYT has been the lower-risk option at 6.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XHB has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XHB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYT.
IYT has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.60% for XHB.
XHB is categorized as Building & Construction, while IYT is Transportation Equities. XHB tracks S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index, while IYT tracks Dow Jones Transportation Average Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHB and 0.42% for IYT.
IYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHB and IYT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer