XGN vs. FOA
XGN (Exagen Inc.) and FOA (Finance Of America Companies Inc.) are both stocks. XGN operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while FOA operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, XGN returned -22.83%/yr vs -24.33%/yr for FOA. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XGN vs. FOA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGN achieves a -27.30% return, which is significantly lower than FOA's -16.89% return.
XGN
- 1D
- -2.64%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- -27.30%
- 6M
- -33.33%
- 1Y
- -38.87%
- 3Y*
- 12.43%
- 5Y*
- -22.83%
- 10Y*
- —
FOA
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- -16.89%
- 6M
- -11.56%
- 1Y
- -3.82%
- 3Y*
- 1.22%
- 5Y*
- -24.33%
- 10Y*
- —
XGN vs. FOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGN Exagen Inc. | -27.30% | 48.29% | 106.03% | -17.08% | -79.36% | -11.89% | -48.03% | 51.19% |
FOA Finance Of America Companies Inc. | -16.89% | -13.90% | 155.64% | -13.39% | -68.01% | -61.83% | 3.69% | 1.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGN and FOA is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2019 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
XGN:
-$0.90
FOA:
$4.39
XGN:
1.45
FOA:
0.12
XGN:
$68.38M
FOA:
$1.15B
XGN:
$39.88M
FOA:
$623.72M
XGN:
-$15.91M
FOA:
$1.78B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGN vs. FOA — Risk / Return Rank
XGN
FOA
XGN vs. FOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exagen Inc. (XGN) and Finance Of America Companies Inc. (FOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XGN | FOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.03 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | -0.09 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | -0.16 | -0.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XGN vs. FOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGN drawdown since its inception was -95.22%, roughly equal to the maximum FOA drawdown of -96.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGN and FOA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGN | FOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.22% | -96.13% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.84% | -45.07% | -32.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.84% | -77.83% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.50% | -94.58% | +3.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.48% | -82.69% | -1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.88% | -57.54% | -13.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.25% | 24.56% | +24.69% |
Volatility
XGN vs. FOA - Volatility Comparison
Exagen Inc. (XGN) has a higher volatility of 28.54% compared to Finance Of America Companies Inc. (FOA) at 10.06%. This indicates that XGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGN | FOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.54% | 10.06% | +18.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.22% | 33.20% | +26.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.16% | 47.24% | +22.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.17% | 76.53% | +6.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.52% | 65.32% | +23.20% |
Dividends
XGN vs. FOA - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGN nor FOA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
XGN vs. FOA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exagen Inc. and Finance Of America Companies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
XGN and FOA have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XGN has higher volatility (28.54%) compared to FOA (10.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XGN dropped -95.22% vs FOA's -96.13%.
FOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XGN and FOA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer