PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFLX vs. FFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XFLX vs. FFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFLX achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than FFOX's 5.76% return.


XFLX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.14%
6M
1.26%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FFOX

1D
-0.79%
1M
3.07%
YTD
5.76%
6M
3.59%
1Y
16.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFLX vs. FFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XFLX
FundX Flexible ETF
1.14%3.67%
FFOX
FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF
5.76%10.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XFLX and FFOX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025

0.68

The correlation between XFLX and FFOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XFLX vs. FFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFLX
XFLX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FFOX
FFOX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFLX vs. FFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XFLXFFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.17

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.33

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.73

5.01

+0.72

XFLX vs. FFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the FFOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFLX and FFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XFLX vs. FFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFLX drawdown since its inception was -6.54%, smaller than the maximum FFOX drawdown of -12.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFLX and FFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XFLXFFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-12.41%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-12.41%

+9.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-1.67%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.94%

-2.23%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

3.28%

-2.52%

Volatility

XFLX vs. FFOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) is 1.07%, while FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that XFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XFLXFFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

5.16%

-4.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

13.96%

-10.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.63%

17.63%

-14.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.68%

17.49%

-12.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.68%

17.49%

-12.81%

XFLX vs. FFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFLX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FFOX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

XFLX vs. FFOX - Dividend Comparison

XFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.69%, more than FFOX's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FFOX
FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF
1.71%1.81%0.00%0.00%
XFLX
FundX Flexible ETF
9.69%9.80%4.55%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


XFLX and FFOX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFOX has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to XFLX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XFLX dropped -6.54% vs FFOX's -12.41%.

On 1-year performance, FFOX leads with 16.40% vs 4.36% for XFLX. On fees, FFOX is cheaper at 1.02% per year. On volatility, XFLX has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FFOX has performed better with a 16.40% return vs 4.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FFOX is cheaper with a 1.02% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for XFLX.

XFLX has the higher dividend yield at 9.69%, compared with 1.71% for FFOX.

XFLX is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while FFOX is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for XFLX and 1.02% for FFOX.

XFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFLX and FFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer