XFLX vs. JOJO
XFLX (FundX Flexible ETF) and JOJO (ATAC Credit Rotation ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XFLX returned 4.92% vs 9.64% for JOJO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XFLX charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for JOJO.
Performance
XFLX vs. JOJO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XFLX achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than JOJO's 2.29% return.
XFLX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 4.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JOJO
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 9.64%
- 3Y*
- 6.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XFLX vs. JOJO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XFLX FundX Flexible ETF | 1.16% | 2.56% | 4.01% | 3.90% |
JOJO ATAC Credit Rotation ETF | 2.29% | 10.52% | 2.74% | 10.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFLX and JOJO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2023 | 0.65 |
The correlation between XFLX and JOJO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
XFLX vs. JOJO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XFLX
JOJO
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
Energy
-
Technology
XFLX
JOJO
-
Industrials
XFLX
JOJO
-
Financial Services
XFLX
JOJO
-
Healthcare
XFLX
JOJO
-
Utilities
XFLX
JOJO
Communication Services
XFLX
JOJO
-
Basic Materials
XFLX
JOJO
-
Consumer Cyclical
XFLX
JOJO
-
Consumer Defensive
XFLX
JOJO
-
Real Estate
XFLX
JOJO
Energy
XFLX
JOJO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XFLX vs. JOJO — Risk / Return Rank
XFLX
JOJO
XFLX vs. JOJO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XFLX | JOJO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 1.46 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 2.23 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 1.96 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | 5.66 | +0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XFLX | JOJO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.46 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | -0.05 | +1.00 |
Drawdowns
XFLX vs. JOJO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFLX drawdown since its inception was -6.54%, smaller than the maximum JOJO drawdown of -28.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFLX and JOJO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFLX | JOJO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.54% | -28.43% | +21.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.11% | -4.93% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -5.89% | +5.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.95% | -15.82% | +14.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 1.71% | -0.96% |
Volatility
XFLX vs. JOJO - Volatility Comparison
FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) have volatilities of 1.22% and 1.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XFLX | JOJO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 1.20% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | 4.83% | -1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53% | 6.62% | -3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.70% | 11.31% | -6.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.70% | 11.31% | -6.61% |
XFLX vs. JOJO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XFLX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than JOJO's 1.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
XFLX vs. JOJO - Dividend Comparison
XFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.68%, more than JOJO's 5.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JOJO ATAC Credit Rotation ETF | 5.13% | 4.78% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 3.63% | 2.53% |
XFLX FundX Flexible ETF | 9.68% | 9.80% | 4.55% | 4.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XFLX and JOJO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XFLX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to JOJO (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XFLX dropped -6.54% vs JOJO's -28.43%.
On 1-year performance, JOJO leads with 9.64% vs 4.92% for XFLX. On fees, XFLX is cheaper at 1.17% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JOJO has performed better with a 9.64% return vs 4.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XFLX is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for JOJO.
XFLX has the higher dividend yield at 9.68%, compared with 5.13% for JOJO.
They also come from different issuers: FundX and ATAC. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for XFLX and 1.28% for JOJO.
JOJO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XFLX and JOJO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer