PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JOJO vs. AGGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JOJO vs. AGGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) and Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JOJO achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly higher than AGGA's 0.91% return.


JOJO

1D
0.09%
1M
0.23%
YTD
2.56%
6M
3.03%
1Y
10.24%
3Y*
6.68%
5Y*
10Y*

AGGA

1D
0.04%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.91%
6M
1.02%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JOJO vs. AGGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JOJO and AGGA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025

0.74

The correlation between JOJO and AGGA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JOJO vs. AGGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JOJO
JOJO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
JOJO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JOJO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
JOJO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
JOJO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JOJO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

AGGA
AGGA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
AGGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JOJO vs. AGGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) and Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JOJOAGGADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.56

2.36

-0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

3.61

-1.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

3.36

-1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.01

13.57

-7.56

JOJO vs. AGGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JOJO Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the AGGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JOJO and AGGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JOJOAGGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

2.36

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

2.24

-2.29

Drawdowns

JOJO vs. AGGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JOJO drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, which is greater than AGGA's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOJO and AGGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JOJOAGGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.43%

-1.47%

-26.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.93%

-1.47%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-0.11%

-5.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-0.22%

-15.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

0.36%

+1.34%

Volatility

JOJO vs. AGGA - Volatility Comparison

ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) at 0.72%. This indicates that JOJO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JOJOAGGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

0.72%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.83%

1.57%

+3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.61%

2.13%

+4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.31%

2.20%

+9.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.31%

2.20%

+9.11%

JOJO vs. AGGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JOJO has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGA's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

JOJO vs. AGGA - Dividend Comparison

JOJO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, more than AGGA's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AGGA
Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF
4.26%2.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JOJO
ATAC Credit Rotation ETF
5.58%4.78%4.88%4.30%3.63%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


JOJO and AGGA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JOJO has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to AGGA (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOJO dropped -28.43% vs AGGA's -1.47%.

On 1-year performance, JOJO leads with 10.24% vs 5.00% for AGGA. On fees, AGGA is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, AGGA has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JOJO has performed better with a 10.24% return vs 5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGGA is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for JOJO.

JOJO has the higher dividend yield at 5.58%, compared with 4.26% for AGGA.

They also come from different issuers: ATAC and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for JOJO and 0.55% for AGGA.

AGGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JOJO and AGGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer