JOJO vs. AGGA
JOJO (ATAC Credit Rotation ETF) and AGGA (Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JOJO returned 10.24% vs 5.00% for AGGA. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JOJO charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AGGA.
Performance
JOJO vs. AGGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JOJO achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly higher than AGGA's 0.91% return.
JOJO
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 2.56%
- 6M
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- 10.24%
- 3Y*
- 6.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGGA
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 5.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JOJO vs. AGGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JOJO ATAC Credit Rotation ETF | 2.56% | 9.14% |
AGGA Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF | 0.91% | 4.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between JOJO and AGGA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025 | 0.74 |
The correlation between JOJO and AGGA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JOJO vs. AGGA — Risk / Return Rank
JOJO
AGGA
JOJO vs. AGGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) and Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JOJO | AGGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 2.36 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 3.61 | -1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.46 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 3.36 | -1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.01 | 13.57 | -7.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JOJO | AGGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 2.36 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 2.24 | -2.29 |
Drawdowns
JOJO vs. AGGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JOJO drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, which is greater than AGGA's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOJO and AGGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JOJO | AGGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.43% | -1.47% | -26.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.93% | -1.47% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -0.11% | -5.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -0.22% | -15.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 0.36% | +1.34% |
Volatility
JOJO vs. AGGA - Volatility Comparison
ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) at 0.72%. This indicates that JOJO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JOJO | AGGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 0.72% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.83% | 1.57% | +3.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.61% | 2.13% | +4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.31% | 2.20% | +9.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.31% | 2.20% | +9.11% |
JOJO vs. AGGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
JOJO has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGA's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
JOJO vs. AGGA - Dividend Comparison
JOJO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, more than AGGA's 4.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGA Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF | 4.26% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JOJO ATAC Credit Rotation ETF | 5.58% | 4.78% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 3.63% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JOJO and AGGA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JOJO has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to AGGA (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOJO dropped -28.43% vs AGGA's -1.47%.
On 1-year performance, JOJO leads with 10.24% vs 5.00% for AGGA. On fees, AGGA is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, AGGA has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JOJO has performed better with a 10.24% return vs 5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGGA is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for JOJO.
JOJO has the higher dividend yield at 5.58%, compared with 4.26% for AGGA.
They also come from different issuers: ATAC and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for JOJO and 0.55% for AGGA.
AGGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JOJO and AGGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer