FFOX vs. BPH

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FFOX (FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFOX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by FundX, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.47, they often move in opposite directions. FFOX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

FFOX vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FFOX

• 1D: -1.47%
• 1M: 0.95%
• 6M: 1.61%
• YTD: 7.42%
• 1Y: 15.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: 4.41%
• 1M: -3.74%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFOX vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FFOX FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF	4.69%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FFOX and BPH is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.47

FFOX vs. BPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFOX	BPH
Industrials	25.6%	-
Technology	22.0%	-
Healthcare	20.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.1%	-
Financial Services	7.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	-
Basic Materials	3.6%	-
Communication Services	2.1%	-
Energy	1.3%	100.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FFOX vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFOX

FFOX Risk / Return Rank: 31
FFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
FFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFOX vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFOX	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.68	—	—

Drawdowns

FFOX vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFOX drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, smaller than the maximum BPH drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOX and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFOX	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.41%	-15.58%	+3.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.15%	-6.41%	+2.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.17%	-6.77%	+4.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FFOX	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.80%	28.88%	-11.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.43%	28.88%	-11.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.43%	28.88%	-11.45%

FFOX vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFOX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFOX vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

FFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than BPH's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.52%	0.00%
FFOX FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF	1.69%	1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFOX and BPH in my portfolio?

FFOX and BPH have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FFOX or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFOX or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for FFOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFOX or BPH?

FFOX has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.52% for BPH.

What is the main difference between FFOX and BPH?

FFOX is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: FundX and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for FFOX and 0.19% for BPH.