PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XFH.TO vs. HEFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XFH.TO vs. HEFA

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

XFH.TO (iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and HEFA (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XFH.TO is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD, while HEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XFH.TO returned 11.20%/yr vs 14.60%/yr for HEFA. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XFH.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HEFA.

Performance

XFH.TO vs. HEFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XFH.TO is traded in CAD, while HEFA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HEFA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFH.TO achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly lower than HEFA's 16.28% return. Over the past 10 years, XFH.TO has underperformed HEFA with an annualized return of 11.20%, while HEFA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.60% annualized return.

XFH.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
YTD
10.88%
6M
10.77%
1Y
24.97%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
11.20%

HEFA

1D
0.34%
1M
5.50%
YTD
16.28%
6M
16.30%
1Y
33.01%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
16.95%
10Y*
14.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFH.TO vs. HEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XFH.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		10.88%21.68%12.60%18.31%-6.58%12.30%0.97%23.27%-10.81%17.68%
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF		16.28%18.89%23.34%17.47%1.17%19.53%-0.33%22.37%-1.71%8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XFH.TO and HEFA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015

0.77

The correlation between XFH.TO and HEFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

XFH.TO vs. HEFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XFH.TO
HEFA

Financial Services

22.6%
24.3%

Industrials

20.3%
18.0%

Technology

11.3%
12.5%

Healthcare

9.6%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
7.1%

Basic Materials

6.8%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
6.5%

Communication Services

4.7%
4.3%

Energy

3.7%
3.3%

Utilities

3.6%
3.4%

Real Estate

2.9%
1.4%

Financial Services

XFH.TO
22.6%
HEFA
24.3%

Industrials

XFH.TO
20.3%
HEFA
18.0%

Technology

XFH.TO
11.3%
HEFA
12.5%

Healthcare

XFH.TO
9.6%
HEFA
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XFH.TO
8.3%
HEFA
7.1%

Basic Materials

XFH.TO
6.8%
HEFA
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

XFH.TO
6.3%
HEFA
6.5%

Communication Services

XFH.TO
4.7%
HEFA
4.3%

Energy

XFH.TO
3.7%
HEFA
3.3%

Utilities

XFH.TO
3.6%
HEFA
3.4%

Real Estate

XFH.TO
2.9%
HEFA
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF

Often compared with XFH.TO:
XFH.TO vs. XEF.TOXFH.TO vs. XIN.TOXFH.TO vs. XLCXFH.TO vs. VIU.TOXFH.TO vs. QQC.TOXFH.TO vs. VEQT.TOXFH.TO vs. VOO
Often compared with HEFA:
HEFA vs. DBEFHEFA vs. HAWXHEFA vs. FNDFHEFA vs. IDMOHEFA vs. HSCZHEFA vs. HEZUHEFA vs. HEWJ

Return for Risk

XFH.TO vs. HEFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XFH.TO
XFH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XFH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XFH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
HEFA
HEFA Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFH.TO vs. HEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XFH.TOHEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.00
2.43

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.84
3.39

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.44

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

3.57

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.69

14.52

-3.83

XFH.TO vs. HEFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the HEFA Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFH.TO and HEFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XFH.TO vs. HEFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFH.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, which is greater than HEFA's maximum drawdown of -29.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFH.TO and HEFA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XFH.TOHEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.85%

-29.81%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-9.28%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.14%

-15.14%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.52%

-15.14%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

-29.81%

-4.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-1.39%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-3.99%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.28%

+0.06%

Volatility

XFH.TO vs. HEFA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO) is 4.21%, while iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that XFH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XFH.TOHEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

4.90%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

11.37%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.52%

13.65%

-1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.07%

15.22%

-1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

17.15%

-1.16%

XFH.TO vs. HEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFH.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than HEFA's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

XFH.TO vs. HEFA - Dividend Comparison

XFH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than HEFA's 3.92% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF		3.92%4.40%3.09%3.02%25.14%3.06%2.10%7.56%4.58%2.55%3.17%3.54%
XFH.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.95%2.16%2.47%2.93%2.93%2.38%1.85%2.60%2.86%2.26%2.17%2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

XFH.TO and HEFA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XFH.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XFH.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HEFA.

XFH.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while HEFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. XFH.TO tracks Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD, while HEFA tracks MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for XFH.TO and 0.35% for HEFA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFH.TO and HEFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer