XFH.TO vs. XIN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO) and iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO).
XFH.TO and XIN.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XFH.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD. It was launched on Feb 10, 2015. XIN.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2001. Both XFH.TO and XIN.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XFH.TO or XIN.TO.
Key characteristics
XFH.TO | XIN.TO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 10.92% | 10.65% |
1Y Return | 14.77% | 14.08% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 5.62% | 7.91% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 7.99% | 8.93% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.38 | 1.32 |
Daily Std Dev | 10.89% | 10.84% |
Max Drawdown | -33.85% | -58.56% |
Current Drawdown | -3.24% | -3.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFH.TO and XIN.TO is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XFH.TO vs. XIN.TO - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XFH.TO having a 10.92% return and XIN.TO slightly lower at 10.65%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XFH.TO vs. XIN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XFH.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than XIN.TO's 0.52% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XFH.TO vs. XIN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO) and iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XFH.TO vs. XIN.TO - Dividend Comparison
XFH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than XIN.TO's 2.46% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 2.85% | 2.93% | 2.93% | 2.31% | 1.74% | 2.45% | 2.68% | 2.13% | 2.04% | 2.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 2.46% | 2.51% | 2.18% | 2.65% | 1.81% | 2.58% | 2.85% | 2.16% | 2.41% | 2.32% | 2.83% | 2.17% |
Drawdowns
XFH.TO vs. XIN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFH.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, smaller than the maximum XIN.TO drawdown of -58.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFH.TO and XIN.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XFH.TO vs. XIN.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO) and iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO) have volatilities of 4.64% and 4.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.