XFH.TO vs. XEF.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO).
XFH.TO and XEF.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XFH.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD. It was launched on Feb 10, 2015. XEF.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD. It was launched on Apr 10, 2013. Both XFH.TO and XEF.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XFH.TO or XEF.TO.
Key characteristics
| XFH.TO | XEF.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.28% | 11.92% |
| 1Y Return | 19.07% | 19.55% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.35% | 5.23% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.34% | 6.73% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.82 | 1.88 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.44 | 2.65 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.33 | 1.33 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.20 | 3.13 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.33 | 12.59 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.88% | 1.56% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.70% | 10.44% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.85% | -28.50% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.05% | -3.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFH.TO and XEF.TO is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XFH.TO vs. XEF.TO - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XFH.TO having a 12.28% return and XEF.TO slightly lower at 11.92%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XFH.TO vs. XEF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XFH.TO and XEF.TO have an expense ratio of 0.22%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XFH.TO vs. XEF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XFH.TO vs. XEF.TO - Dividend Comparison
XFH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than XEF.TO's 2.57% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XFH.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 2.82% | 2.93% | 2.93% | 2.31% | 1.74% | 2.45% | 2.68% | 2.13% | 2.04% | 2.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEF.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF | 2.57% | 2.75% | 2.93% | 2.42% | 1.93% | 2.72% | 2.76% | 2.10% | 2.42% | 2.42% | 5.21% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
XFH.TO vs. XEF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFH.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, which is greater than XEF.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFH.TO and XEF.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XFH.TO vs. XEF.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO) is 3.33%, while iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that XFH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.