XEMD vs. YCS
XEMD (BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - XEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XEMD returned 10.14%/yr vs 17.34%/yr for YCS. Their -0.36 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. XEMD charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
XEMD vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEMD achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.29% return.
XEMD
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 8.65%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.24%
YCS
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- 25.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.34%
- 5Y*
- 23.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.44M | $11.46M | $8.01M | |
| $1.53M | $2.43M | $1.42M |
XEMD vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 2.49% | 13.98% | 8.77% | 10.26% | 2.40% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.29% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | -7.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEMD and YCS is -0.35, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022 | -0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEMD vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
XEMD
YCS
XEMD vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XEMD | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.23 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 2.35 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 8.93 | +2.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XEMD vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEMD drawdown since its inception was -10.01%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMD and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEMD | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.01% | -49.56% | +39.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.52% | -8.30% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.23% | -23.05% | +18.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | -5.68% | +4.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -19.75% | +18.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 2.64% | -1.83% |
Volatility
XEMD vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) is 0.96%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that XEMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEMD | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.96% | 5.30% | -4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.80% | 11.65% | -7.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.74% | 16.85% | -12.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.80% | 21.16% | -14.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.80% | 18.61% | -11.81% |
XEMD vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
XEMD vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
XEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 5.24% | 6.15% | 6.30% | 6.19% | 3.08% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEMD and YCS have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YCS has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to XEMD (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XEMD dropped -10.01% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 3-year performance, YCS leads with 17.34% vs 10.14% for XEMD. On fees, XEMD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, XEMD has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, YCS has performed better with a 17.34% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XEMD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
XEMD has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
XEMD is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. XEMD tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XEMD and 1.00% for YCS.
XEMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XEMD and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer