XEMD vs. MU
XEMD (BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, XEMD returned 10.14%/yr vs 127.41%/yr for MU. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
XEMD vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEMD achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 188.53% return.
XEMD
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 8.88%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.24%
MU
- 1D
- -5.90%
- 1M
- -20.26%
- 6M
- 98.49%
- YTD
- 188.53%
- 1Y
- 655.32%
- 3Y*
- 127.41%
- 5Y*
- 61.18%
- 10Y*
- 51.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.28B | $42.78B | $49.13B | |
| $5.44M | $11.46M | $8.01M |
XEMD vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 2.49% | 13.98% | 8.77% | 10.26% | 2.40% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 188.53% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -10.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEMD and MU is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEMD vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
XEMD
MU
XEMD vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XEMD | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.63 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 16.92 | -14.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 64.08 | -53.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XEMD vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEMD drawdown since its inception was -10.01%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMD and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEMD | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.01% | -98.25% | +88.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.52% | -39.10% | +35.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.23% | -57.63% | +53.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | -32.17% | +31.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -58.02% | +56.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 10.31% | -9.50% |
Volatility
XEMD vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) is 0.96%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 31.11%. This indicates that XEMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEMD | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.96% | 31.11% | -30.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.80% | 67.64% | -63.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.74% | 81.13% | -76.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.80% | 56.32% | -49.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.80% | 51.42% | -44.62% |
Dividends
XEMD vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
XEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than MU's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 5.82% | 6.15% | 6.30% | 6.19% | 3.08% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEMD and MU have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (31.11%) compared to XEMD (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XEMD dropped -10.01% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XEMD and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer