PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEMD vs. GOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEMD vs. GOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEMD achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than GOOG's 13.29% return.


XEMD

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.07%
6M
2.43%
YTD
3.09%
1Y
10.58%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
10Y*

GOOG

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.43%
6M
8.01%
YTD
13.29%
1Y
96.37%
3Y*
44.91%
5Y*
22.55%
10Y*
25.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEMD vs. GOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
3.09%13.98%8.77%10.26%2.40%
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
13.29%65.42%35.62%58.83%-20.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XEMD and GOOG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEMD vs. GOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEMD
XEMD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XEMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEMD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
XEMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEMD Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOG
GOOG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEMD vs. GOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XEMDGOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.56

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

4.81

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.99

15.22

-2.24

XEMD vs. GOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is lower than the GOOG Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEMD and GOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEMD vs. GOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEMD drawdown since its inception was -10.01%, smaller than the maximum GOOG drawdown of -44.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMD and GOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEMDGOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.01%

-44.60%

+34.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-20.75%

+17.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.31%

-29.35%

+25.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-10.98%

+10.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-8.90%

+7.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

6.54%

-5.75%

Volatility

XEMD vs. GOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) is 1.26%, while Alphabet Inc (GOOG) has a volatility of 9.73%. This indicates that XEMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEMDGOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

9.73%

-8.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.77%

21.66%

-17.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.71%

29.43%

-24.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.84%

31.40%

-24.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.84%

29.11%

-22.27%

Dividends

XEMD vs. GOOG - Dividend Comparison

XEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, more than GOOG's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
0.24%0.26%0.32%0.00%0.00%
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
5.78%6.15%6.30%6.19%3.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEMD and GOOG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOG has higher volatility (9.73%) compared to XEMD (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XEMD dropped -10.01% vs GOOG's -44.60%.

GOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEMD and GOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer