PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEMD vs. DINO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEMD vs. DINO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and HF Sinclair Corp (DINO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEMD achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than DINO's 101.90% return.


XEMD

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.62%
6M
1.43%
YTD
2.49%
1Y
8.88%
3Y*
10.14%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.24%

DINO

1D
-1.05%
1M
26.06%
6M
78.95%
YTD
101.90%
1Y
115.95%
3Y*
25.49%
5Y*
29.70%
10Y*
17.51%
ALL TIME*
16.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$287.29M$249.33M$194.85M
$5.44M$11.46M$8.01M

XEMD vs. DINO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
2.49%13.98%8.77%10.26%2.40%
DINO
HF Sinclair Corp
101.90%38.14%-34.36%11.04%13.88%

Correlation

The correlation between XEMD and DINO is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022

0.12

The correlation between XEMD and DINO shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEMD vs. DINO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XEMD
XEMD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XEMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEMD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XEMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEMD Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DINO
DINO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DINO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DINO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DINO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DINO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DINO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XEMD vs. DINO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and HF Sinclair Corp (DINO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XEMDDINODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.46

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

6.64

-4.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.95

17.04

-6.09

XEMD vs. DINO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the DINO Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEMD and DINO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEMD vs. DINO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEMD drawdown since its inception was -10.01%, smaller than the maximum DINO drawdown of -85.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMD and DINO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEMDDINODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.01%

-85.99%

+75.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-17.57%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.23%

-57.35%

+53.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-1.05%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.23%

-27.93%

+26.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

6.83%

-6.02%

Volatility

XEMD vs. DINO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) is 0.96%, while HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that XEMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DINO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEMDDINODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

9.89%

-8.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.80%

30.63%

-26.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.74%

37.03%

-32.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.80%

38.67%

-31.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.80%

44.19%

-37.39%

Dividends

XEMD vs. DINO - Dividend Comparison

XEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than DINO's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DINO
HF Sinclair Corp
2.19%4.34%5.71%3.24%2.31%1.07%5.42%2.64%2.58%2.58%4.03%3.28%
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
5.82%6.15%6.30%6.19%3.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEMD and DINO have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DINO has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to XEMD (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XEMD dropped -10.01% vs DINO's -85.99%.

DINO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEMD and DINO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer