DINO vs. SLB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB).

Performance

DINO vs. SLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DINO vs. SLB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DINO HF Sinclair Corp	36.76%	38.14%	-34.36%	11.04%	61.94%	27.97%	-46.47%	1.94%	1.99%	63.28%
SLB Schlumberger Limited	34.69%	3.27%	-24.47%	-0.78%	81.15%	40.30%	-43.81%	17.73%	-44.66%	-17.37%

Fundamentals

Market Cap DINO : $11.41B SLB : $76.47B
EPS DINO : $3.11 SLB : $2.31
PE Ratio DINO : 20.03 SLB : 22.20
PEG Ratio DINO : 0.19 SLB : 1.05
PS Ratio DINO : 0.43 SLB : 2.08
PB Ratio DINO : 1.23 SLB : 2.07
Total Revenue (TTM) DINO : $26.87B SLB : $35.71B
Gross Profit (TTM) DINO : $2.21B SLB : $6.50B
EBITDA (TTM) DINO : $1.83B SLB : $7.15B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DINO achieves a 36.76% return, which is significantly higher than SLB's 34.69% return. Over the past 10 years, DINO has outperformed SLB with an annualized return of 9.91%, while SLB has yielded a comparatively lower -0.51% annualized return.

DINO

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 26.01%
• YTD: 36.76%
• 6M: 21.49%
• 1Y: 98.15%
• 3Y*: 13.56%
• 5Y*: 13.97%
• 10Y*: 9.91%

SLB

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 34.69%
• 6M: 51.59%
• 1Y: 26.70%
• 3Y*: 4.15%
• 5Y*: 15.31%
• 10Y*: -0.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DINO vs. SLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DINO

DINO Risk / Return Rank: 92
DINO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
DINO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
DINO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DINO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DINO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

SLB

SLB Risk / Return Rank: 63
SLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SLB Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SLB Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DINO vs. SLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DINO	SLB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	0.68	+1.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	1.17	+1.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.16	+0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.24	1.09	+3.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.00	1.85	+11.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DINO vs. SLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DINO Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the SLB Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DINO and SLB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DINO	SLB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	0.68	+1.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.40	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	-0.01	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.13	+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between DINO and SLB is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DINO vs. SLB - Dividend Comparison

DINO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than SLB's 2.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DINO HF Sinclair Corp	3.21%	4.34%	5.71%	3.24%	2.31%	1.07%	5.42%	2.64%	2.58%	2.58%	4.03%	3.28%
SLB Schlumberger Limited	2.24%	2.97%	2.87%	1.92%	1.22%	2.09%	4.01%	4.98%	5.54%	2.97%	2.38%	2.87%

Drawdowns

DINO vs. SLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DINO drawdown since its inception was -85.99%, roughly equal to the maximum SLB drawdown of -87.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DINO and SLB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DINO	SLB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.99%	-87.64%	+1.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.91%	-24.29%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.35%	-46.63%	-10.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.35%	-84.29%	+6.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.12%	-39.51%	+37.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.16%	-31.17%	+3.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.47%	14.34%	-6.87%

Volatility

DINO vs. SLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) is 12.72%, while Schlumberger Limited (SLB) has a volatility of 14.74%. This indicates that DINO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DINO	SLB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.72%	14.74%	-2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.78%	26.09%	+1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.97%	39.65%	+0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.87%	38.16%	+0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.30%	40.36%	+3.94%

Financials

DINO vs. SLB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between HF Sinclair Corp and Schlumberger Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

DINO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, HF Sinclair Corp reported a gross profit of 131.00M and revenue of 6.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 2.0%.

SLB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 9.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.7%.

DINO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, HF Sinclair Corp reported an operating income of -2.00M and revenue of 6.46B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.0%.

SLB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported an operating income of 1.46B and revenue of 9.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.0%.

DINO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, HF Sinclair Corp reported a net income of -28.00M and revenue of 6.46B, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.

SLB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a net income of 800.00M and revenue of 9.75B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.