XEL vs. FGR.PA
XEL (Xcel Energy Inc.) and FGR.PA (Eiffage SA) are both stocks. XEL operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while FGR.PA operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, XEL returned 9.60%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for FGR.PA. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XEL vs. FGR.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XEL is traded in USD, while FGR.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FGR.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEL achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly higher than FGR.PA's 0.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XEL having a 9.60% annualized return and FGR.PA not far ahead at 9.75%.
XEL
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- YTD
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
FGR.PA
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- 6M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
XEL vs. FGR.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEL Xcel Energy Inc. | 10.02% | 13.89% | 12.32% | -8.67% | 6.44% | 4.40% | 7.77% | 32.37% | 5.88% | 21.91% |
FGR.PA Eiffage SA | 0.03% | 70.16% | -14.73% | 12.70% | -1.26% | 10.15% | -15.65% | 40.77% | -22.31% | 60.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEL and FGR.PA is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEL vs. FGR.PA — Risk / Return Rank
XEL
FGR.PA
XEL vs. FGR.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) and Eiffage SA (FGR.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XEL | FGR.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.06 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 0.26 | +1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.56 | 0.49 | +4.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XEL vs. FGR.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEL drawdown since its inception was -80.64%, roughly equal to the maximum FGR.PA drawdown of -84.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEL and FGR.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEL | FGR.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.64% | -84.14% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -18.30% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.42% | -24.99% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.41% | -28.40% | -6.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.41% | -53.09% | +18.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -16.76% | +13.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.30% | -33.48% | +22.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 9.73% | -5.21% |
Volatility
XEL vs. FGR.PA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) is 6.14%, while Eiffage SA (FGR.PA) has a volatility of 7.72%. This indicates that XEL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGR.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEL | FGR.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.14% | 7.72% | -1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.92% | 20.27% | -5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.51% | 26.13% | -6.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 25.68% | -4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.74% | 27.54% | -5.80% |
Dividends
XEL vs. FGR.PA - Dividend Comparison
XEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than FGR.PA's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGR.PA Eiffage SA | 3.96% | 3.84% | 4.84% | 3.71% | 3.37% | 3.32% | 0.00% | 2.35% | 2.74% | 1.64% | 2.26% | 2.02% |
XEL Xcel Energy Inc. | 2.90% | 3.83% | 2.43% | 3.36% | 2.78% | 2.70% | 2.58% | 2.55% | 3.09% | 2.99% | 3.34% | 3.56% |
Financials
XEL vs. FGR.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xcel Energy Inc. and Eiffage SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
XEL and FGR.PA have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for XEL and FGR.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer