PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDUS.L vs. PBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDUS.L vs. PBUS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDUS.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C) and PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while PBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDUS.L returned 14.56%/yr vs 14.81%/yr for PBUS. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDUS.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for PBUS.

Performance

XDUS.L vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDUS.L is traded in GBp, while PBUS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PBUS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDUS.L achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than PBUS's 11.76% return.

XDUS.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.63%
YTD
10.50%
6M
10.29%
1Y
28.78%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
14.56%
10Y*
16.05%

PBUS

1D
0.44%
1M
5.69%
YTD
11.76%
6M
10.27%
1Y
29.39%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
14.81%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDUS.L vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C		10.50%9.21%27.38%20.65%-10.42%28.96%16.52%26.57%-0.19%8.18%
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF		11.76%9.20%27.17%20.97%-10.09%27.97%18.17%26.59%0.88%6.99%

Correlation

The correlation between XDUS.L and PBUS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017

0.56

The correlation between XDUS.L and PBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDUS.L vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDUS.L
PBUS

Technology

35.4%
35.4%

Financial Services

11.6%
11.6%

Communication Services

11.3%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.6%

Industrials

8.6%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.8%

Energy

3.6%
3.6%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

XDUS.L
35.4%
PBUS
35.4%

Financial Services

XDUS.L
11.6%
PBUS
11.6%

Communication Services

XDUS.L
11.3%
PBUS
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XDUS.L
10.1%
PBUS
10.1%

Healthcare

XDUS.L
8.6%
PBUS
8.6%

Industrials

XDUS.L
8.6%
PBUS
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

XDUS.L
4.8%
PBUS
4.8%

Energy

XDUS.L
3.6%
PBUS
3.6%

Utilities

XDUS.L
2.3%
PBUS
2.3%

Real Estate

XDUS.L
1.9%
PBUS
1.9%

Basic Materials

XDUS.L
1.8%
PBUS
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C

Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF

Often compared with XDUS.L:
XDUS.L vs. EUSAXDUS.L vs. CU1.LXDUS.L vs. GPSA.LXDUS.L vs. XNAQ.LXDUS.L vs. HMUS.LXDUS.L vs. XWD1.DEXDUS.L vs. XZMD.L
Often compared with PBUS:
PBUS vs. VOOPBUS vs. SPYPBUS vs. XLGPBUS vs. PWVPBUS vs. VVPBUS vs. IVVPBUS vs. VTI

Return for Risk

XDUS.L vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDUS.L
XDUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XDUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
PBUS
PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDUS.L vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XDUS.LPBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.68
2.53

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.59
3.29

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.47

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

3.64

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.55

13.33

+0.22

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDUS.L vs. PBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the PBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDUS.L and PBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XDUS.LPBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

2.53

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.93

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.81

+0.27

Drawdowns

XDUS.L vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.82%, roughly equal to the maximum PBUS drawdown of -25.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDUS.L and PBUS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDUS.LPBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.82%

-25.89%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.50%

-8.11%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.51%

-22.27%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.51%

-22.27%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.82%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

0.00%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-3.85%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

2.21%

-0.09%

Volatility

XDUS.L vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) have volatilities of 2.60% and 2.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDUS.LPBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

2.60%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

8.31%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.70%

11.65%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

15.93%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

19.08%

-2.83%

XDUS.L vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDUS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XDUS.L vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison

XDUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF		0.98%1.05%1.20%1.36%1.71%0.98%1.35%1.53%2.33%0.50%
XDUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XDUS.L and PBUS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for XDUS.L.

XDUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. XDUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XDUS.L and 0.04% for PBUS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDUS.L and PBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer