XDSQ vs. VT

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDSQ is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. XDSQ is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDSQ returned 9.77%/yr vs 10.65%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDSQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

XDSQ vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDSQ achieves a 2.98% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 11.06% return.

XDSQ

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 2.98%
• 6M: 3.88%
• 1Y: 16.05%
• 3Y*: 14.62%
• 5Y*: 9.77%
• 10Y*: —

VT

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 6M: 11.82%
• 1Y: 27.43%
• 3Y*: 19.71%
• 5Y*: 10.65%
• 10Y*: 12.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDSQ vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	2.98%	14.22%	23.12%	23.00%	-16.78%	13.28%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	11.06%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	12.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XDSQ and VT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021	0.91

The correlation between XDSQ and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDSQ vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDSQ	VT
Technology	35.7%	27.8%
Financial Services	11.6%	15.9%
Communication Services	11.3%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	9.5%
Healthcare	8.5%	8.1%
Industrials	8.3%	12.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.8%
Energy	3.5%	4.3%
Utilities	2.4%	2.7%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.4%
Basic Materials	1.8%	4.2%

Return for Risk

XDSQ vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDSQ

XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 48
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 56
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 52

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 68
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDSQ vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDSQ	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.94	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	2.67	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.35	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	2.68	-1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.76	11.67	-3.91

XDSQ vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDSQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDSQ and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XDSQ vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDSQ drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDSQ and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDSQ	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.06%	-50.27%	+24.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.60%	-9.67%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.15%	-16.51%	-2.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.06%	-26.38%	+0.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.92%	+1.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.94%	-7.01%	+2.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	2.22%	-0.21%

Volatility

XDSQ vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) is 0.68%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that XDSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDSQ	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.68%	5.26%	-4.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.37%	11.01%	-2.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.53%	13.38%	-2.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.27%	16.15%	-0.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.06%	17.27%	-2.21%

XDSQ vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDSQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDSQ vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.61%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDSQ and VT in my portfolio?

XDSQ and VT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XDSQ or VT?

VT has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to XDSQ (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDSQ dropped -26.06% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which ETF is better, XDSQ or VT?

On 5-year performance, VT leads with 10.65% vs 9.77% for XDSQ. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XDSQ or VT?

Over the 5-year period, VT has performed better with a 10.65% return vs 9.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDSQ or VT?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDSQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDSQ or VT?

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

What is the main difference between XDSQ and VT?

XDSQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDSQ and 0.06% for VT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.