XDSQ vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XDSQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

XDSQ vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDSQ achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 259.95% return.

XDSQ

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 1.17%
• 6M: 2.50%
• YTD: 4.06%
• 1Y: 14.72%
• 3Y*: 13.83%
• 5Y*: 9.46%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.43%

LINT

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: -47.53%
• 6M: 154.25%
• YTD: 259.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.47M	$20.67M	$35.74M
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	$337.95K	$898.70K	$479.40K

XDSQ vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	4.06%	4.96%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	259.95%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XDSQ and LINT is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.40

XDSQ vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDSQ	LINT
Technology	39.1%	100.0%
Financial Services	10.9%	-
Communication Services	10.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	-
Healthcare	8.3%	-
Industrials	7.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	-
Energy	3.1%	-
Utilities	2.1%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

XDSQ vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XDSQ

XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 49
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 54

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XDSQ vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDSQ	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.43	—	—

Drawdowns

XDSQ vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDSQ drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDSQ and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDSQ	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.06%	-69.02%	+42.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-62.88%	+62.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-23.85%	+19.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XDSQ	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.13%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.98%	169.51%	-158.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.29%	169.51%	-154.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.95%	169.51%	-154.56%

XDSQ vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDSQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDSQ vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.

Position	TTM	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.76%	0.25%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDSQ and LINT in my portfolio?

XDSQ and LINT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDSQ or LINT?

On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDSQ or LINT?

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDSQ or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

What is the main difference between XDSQ and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDSQ and 0.97% for LINT.