XDSQ vs. COTG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDSQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.

Performance

XDSQ vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDSQ achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 20.04% return.

XDSQ

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 1.36%
• YTD: 2.84%
• 6M: 3.73%
• 1Y: 16.08%
• 3Y*: 15.08%
• 5Y*: 9.81%
• 10Y*: —

COTG

• 1D: 2.32%
• 1M: -9.84%
• YTD: 20.04%
• 6M: 10.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDSQ vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	2.84%	4.76%
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	20.04%	-21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XDSQ and COTG is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025	0.01

Return for Risk

XDSQ vs. COTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDSQ

XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 45
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDSQ vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDSQ	COTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.02	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDSQ	COTG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	-0.21	+0.90

Drawdowns

XDSQ vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDSQ drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, roughly equal to the maximum COTG drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDSQ and COTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDSQ	COTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.06%	-25.69%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-21.71%	+21.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.96%	-8.42%	+3.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XDSQ	COTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.54%	40.63%	-30.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.27%	40.63%	-25.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.09%	40.63%	-25.54%

XDSQ vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDSQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDSQ vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDSQ nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDSQ and COTG in my portfolio?

XDSQ and COTG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDSQ or COTG?

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDSQ or COTG?

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDSQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDSQ or COTG?

XDSQ and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XDSQ and COTG?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDSQ and 0.75% for COTG.