PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDOC vs. QFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDOC vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XDOC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QFLR

1D
0.01%
1M
3.99%
YTD
6.90%
6M
5.88%
1Y
26.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDOC vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


XDOC vs. QFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDOC
QFLR

Technology

35.4%
50.8%

Financial Services

13.3%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
12.1%

Communication Services

10.6%
18.4%

Healthcare

8.7%
3.2%

Industrials

7.5%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
9.2%

Energy

3.0%
1.1%

Utilities

2.4%
1.5%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%
0.0%

Technology

XDOC
35.4%
QFLR
50.8%

Financial Services

XDOC
13.3%
QFLR
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XDOC
10.7%
QFLR
12.1%

Communication Services

XDOC
10.6%
QFLR
18.4%

Healthcare

XDOC
8.7%
QFLR
3.2%

Industrials

XDOC
7.5%
QFLR
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

XDOC
4.9%
QFLR
9.2%

Energy

XDOC
3.0%
QFLR
1.1%

Utilities

XDOC
2.4%
QFLR
1.5%

Real Estate

XDOC
1.9%
QFLR

-

Basic Materials

XDOC
1.6%
QFLR
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDOC vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDOC

QFLR
QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDOC vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XDOC vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDOCQFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

Drawdowns

XDOC vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDOC drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDOC and QFLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDOCQFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-13.97%

+13.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.48%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-2.50%

+2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

Volatility

XDOC vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDOCQFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

11.28%

-11.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

12.62%

-12.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

12.62%

-12.62%

XDOC vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDOC vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDOC nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
0.00%0.02%0.03%
XDOC
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, XDOC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDOC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

XDOC and QFLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

XDOC is categorized as Options Trading, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDOC and 0.89% for QFLR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDOC and QFLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer