PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDIV vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDIV having a 9.87% return and SPYV slightly higher at 10.14%.


XDIV

1D
0.84%
1M
0.16%
6M
8.62%
YTD
9.87%
1Y
21.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.71%

SPYV

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.68%
6M
7.56%
YTD
10.14%
1Y
21.27%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
11.92%
ALL TIME*
7.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$129.05M$117.43M$146.49M
$776.99K$488.30K$530.83K

XDIV vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and SPYV is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.71

The correlation between XDIV and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDIV vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDIV
SPYV

Technology

38.5%
21.7%

Financial Services

11.6%
15.1%

Communication Services

9.9%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
10.6%

Healthcare

8.9%
12.2%

Industrials

8.4%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
8.8%

Energy

3.0%
6.6%

Utilities

2.2%
4.5%

Real Estate

1.8%
3.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.3%

Technology

XDIV
38.5%
SPYV
21.7%

Financial Services

XDIV
11.6%
SPYV
15.1%

Communication Services

XDIV
9.9%
SPYV
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XDIV
9.5%
SPYV
10.6%

Healthcare

XDIV
8.9%
SPYV
12.2%

Industrials

XDIV
8.4%
SPYV
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

XDIV
4.5%
SPYV
8.8%

Energy

XDIV
3.0%
SPYV
6.6%

Utilities

XDIV
2.2%
SPYV
4.5%

Real Estate

XDIV
1.8%
SPYV
3.3%

Basic Materials

XDIV
1.7%
SPYV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDIV vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XDIV
XDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XDIV vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDIVSPYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

3.17

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

12.28

-2.90

XDIV vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDIV and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and SPYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIVSPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-58.45%

+49.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-6.22%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-1.13%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-8.67%

+7.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.61%

+0.51%

Volatility

XDIV vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.72%. This indicates that XDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDIVSPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

2.72%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

7.14%

+3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.97%

9.99%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.66%

14.30%

-1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.66%

16.88%

-4.22%

XDIV vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDIV vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.69%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%
XDIV
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDIV and SPYV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XDIV has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to SPYV (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDIV dropped -9.16% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

On 1-year performance, XDIV leads with 21.62% vs 21.27% for SPYV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XDIV has performed better with a 21.62% return vs 21.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XDIV.

SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XDIV and 0.04% for SPYV.

SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV and SPYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer