XDIV vs. QQQ
XDIV (Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDIV is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Roundhill, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. XDIV is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDIV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
XDIV vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
XDIV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
XDIV vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XDIV Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF | 10.63% | 9.90% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 10.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDIV and QQQ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025 | 0.92 |
XDIV vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDIV
QQQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XDIV
QQQ
Financial Services
XDIV
QQQ
Communication Services
XDIV
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
XDIV
QQQ
Healthcare
XDIV
QQQ
Industrials
XDIV
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
XDIV
QQQ
Energy
XDIV
QQQ
Utilities
XDIV
QQQ
Real Estate
XDIV
QQQ
Basic Materials
XDIV
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDIV vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
XDIV
QQQ
XDIV vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDIV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.98 | 0.41 | +1.57 |
Drawdowns
XDIV vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDIV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.16% | -82.97% | +73.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.26% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -32.79% | +31.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.11% | — |
Volatility
XDIV vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDIV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 15.94% | -3.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 22.38% | -10.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 22.29% | -9.98% |
XDIV vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDIV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDIV vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
XDIV Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, XDIV and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDIV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.
XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDIV and 0.18% for QQQ.
Find the right allocation for XDIV and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer