PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XDIV vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XDIV vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XDIV
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF
-4.43%9.90%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
-5.93%10.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a -4.43% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's -5.93% return.


XDIV

1D
3.27%
1M
-4.79%
YTD
-4.43%
6M
-1.61%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
3.39%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
-5.93%
6M
-3.62%
1Y
23.68%
3Y*
22.32%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
18.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XDIV vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XDIV vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDIV

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XDIV vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDIVQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.37

+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and QQQ is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XDIV vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDIV
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.49%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and QQQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIVQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-82.97%

+73.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.19%

-8.98%

+2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-32.99%

+31.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

Volatility

XDIV vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XDIVQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

22.67%

-10.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

22.39%

-9.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

22.25%

-9.64%