XDIV vs. RPG
XDIV (Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDIV is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Roundhill, while RPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. XDIV is actively managed, while RPG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDIV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.
Performance
XDIV vs. RPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 31.51% return.
XDIV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RPG
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 11.54%
- YTD
- 31.51%
- 6M
- 32.14%
- 1Y
- 41.04%
- 3Y*
- 28.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.81%
XDIV vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XDIV Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF | 10.63% | 9.90% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 31.51% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDIV and RPG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025 | 0.81 |
XDIV vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDIV
RPG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XDIV
RPG
Financial Services
XDIV
RPG
Communication Services
XDIV
RPG
Consumer Cyclical
XDIV
RPG
Healthcare
XDIV
RPG
Industrials
XDIV
RPG
Consumer Defensive
XDIV
RPG
Energy
XDIV
RPG
Utilities
XDIV
RPG
Real Estate
XDIV
RPG
Basic Materials
XDIV
RPG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDIV vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank
XDIV
RPG
XDIV vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDIV | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.98 | 0.54 | +1.44 |
Drawdowns
XDIV vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and RPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDIV | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.16% | -53.27% | +44.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | 0.00% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -8.84% | +7.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.83% | — |
Volatility
XDIV vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDIV | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 19.73% | -7.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 23.44% | -11.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 22.70% | -10.39% |
XDIV vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDIV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDIV vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison
XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.17% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
XDIV Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDIV and RPG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDIV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.
RPG has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.
XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while RPG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDIV and 0.35% for RPG.
Find the right allocation for XDIV and RPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer