PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV vs. MAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDIV vs. MAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly higher than MAGX's -4.18% return.


XDIV

1D
-0.50%
1M
0.17%
6M
8.66%
YTD
10.23%
1Y
21.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGX

1D
-3.78%
1M
6.35%
6M
-0.40%
YTD
-4.18%
1Y
26.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDIV vs. MAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and MAGX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.78

The correlation between XDIV and MAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDIV vs. MAGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDIV
MAGX

Technology

39.0%

-

Financial Services

11.1%
37.2%

Communication Services

10.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%

-

Healthcare

8.3%

-

Industrials

7.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.5%

-

Energy

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

XDIV
39.0%
MAGX

-

Financial Services

XDIV
11.1%
MAGX
37.2%

Communication Services

XDIV
10.6%
MAGX

-

Consumer Cyclical

XDIV
9.9%
MAGX

-

Healthcare

XDIV
8.3%
MAGX

-

Industrials

XDIV
7.8%
MAGX

-

Consumer Defensive

XDIV
4.5%
MAGX

-

Energy

XDIV
3.1%
MAGX

-

Utilities

XDIV
2.1%
MAGX

-

Real Estate

XDIV
1.8%
MAGX

-

Basic Materials

XDIV
1.7%
MAGX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDIV vs. MAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDIV
XDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV vs. MAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDIVMAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.13

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

0.70

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.38

1.96

+8.42

XDIV vs. MAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the MAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDIV and MAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. MAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum MAGX drawdown of -54.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and MAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIVMAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-54.19%

+45.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-37.24%

+28.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-12.66%

+11.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-13.84%

+12.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

13.29%

-11.21%

Volatility

XDIV vs. MAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) is 3.24%, while Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) has a volatility of 15.91%. This indicates that XDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDIVMAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

15.91%

-12.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

33.66%

-23.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

42.95%

-30.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

53.65%

-41.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

53.65%

-41.04%

XDIV vs. MAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDIV vs. MAGX - Dividend Comparison

XDIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%.


PositionTTM20252024
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
2.14%2.05%0.86%
XDIV
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDIV and MAGX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAGX has higher volatility (15.91%) compared to XDIV (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDIV dropped -9.16% vs MAGX's -54.19%.

On 1-year performance, MAGX leads with 26.01% vs 21.53% for XDIV. On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAGX has performed better with a 26.01% return vs 21.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDIV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MAGX.

MAGX has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.00% for XDIV.

XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while MAGX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XDIV and 0.95% for MAGX.

XDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV and MAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer