PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV vs. BOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDIV vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly higher than BOXX's 1.58% return.


XDIV

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.14%
YTD
10.63%
6M
10.83%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BOXX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.97%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDIV vs. BOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and BOXX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025

0.03

XDIV vs. BOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDIV
BOXX

Technology

36.2%
33.1%

Financial Services

11.9%
12.3%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.8%

Industrials

8.1%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.4%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.9%

Technology

XDIV
36.2%
BOXX
33.1%

Financial Services

XDIV
11.9%
BOXX
12.3%

Communication Services

XDIV
10.9%
BOXX
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XDIV
10.1%
BOXX
10.1%

Healthcare

XDIV
8.4%
BOXX
9.8%

Industrials

XDIV
8.1%
BOXX
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

XDIV
4.9%
BOXX
5.4%

Energy

XDIV
3.5%
BOXX
3.5%

Utilities

XDIV
2.3%
BOXX
2.5%

Real Estate

XDIV
1.9%
BOXX
2.0%

Basic Materials

XDIV
1.8%
BOXX
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDIV vs. BOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDIV

BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XDIV vs. BOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDIVBOXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.98

12.91

-10.93

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and BOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIVBOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-0.12%

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

0.00%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-0.00%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

Volatility

XDIV vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDIVBOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

0.32%

+11.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.31%

0.37%

+11.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.31%

0.37%

+11.94%

XDIV vs. BOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BOXX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDIV vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDIV nor BOXX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
0.00%0.00%0.26%
XDIV
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDIV and BOXX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BOXX.

XDIV and BOXX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while BOXX is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDIV and 0.19% for BOXX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV and BOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer