PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV vs. GAUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDIV vs. GAUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly higher than GAUG's 5.87% return.


XDIV

1D
-0.55%
1M
1.16%
6M
8.21%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GAUG

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.02%
6M
4.99%
YTD
5.87%
1Y
11.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDIV vs. GAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDIV and GAUG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.91

The correlation between XDIV and GAUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDIV vs. GAUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDIV
XDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GAUG
GAUG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
GAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDIV vs. GAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDIVGAUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.91

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.37

15.10

-4.73

XDIV vs. GAUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the GAUG Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDIV and GAUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDIV vs. GAUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV drawdown since its inception was -9.16%, smaller than the maximum GAUG drawdown of -10.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV and GAUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIVGAUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-10.08%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-4.01%

-5.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-0.15%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-0.71%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

0.77%

+1.31%

Volatility

XDIV vs. GAUG - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) at 1.09%. This indicates that XDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDIVGAUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

1.09%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

4.37%

+5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

5.55%

+7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.67%

7.43%

+5.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.67%

7.43%

+5.24%

XDIV vs. GAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GAUG's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDIV vs. GAUG - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDIV nor GAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, XDIV and GAUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XDIV has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to GAUG (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDIV dropped -9.16% vs GAUG's -10.08%.

On 1-year performance, XDIV leads with 21.49% vs 11.61% for GAUG. On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XDIV has performed better with a 21.49% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDIV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GAUG.

XDIV and GAUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

XDIV is categorized as S&P 500, while GAUG is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XDIV and 0.85% for GAUG.

GAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV and GAUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer