PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAUG vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAUG vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GAUG having a 4.97% return and XYLD slightly lower at 4.96%.


GAUG

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.59%
YTD
4.97%
6M
5.40%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XYLD

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.00%
YTD
4.96%
6M
6.48%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
8.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAUG vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August
4.97%11.28%11.78%5.84%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.96%8.02%19.49%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between GAUG and XYLD is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023

0.80

The correlation between GAUG and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

GAUG vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GAUG
XYLD

Technology

36.2%
35.6%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.8%

Communication Services

10.9%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.2%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.5%

Industrials

8.1%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

GAUG
36.2%
XYLD
35.6%

Financial Services

GAUG
11.9%
XYLD
11.8%

Communication Services

GAUG
10.9%
XYLD
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GAUG
10.1%
XYLD
10.2%

Healthcare

GAUG
8.4%
XYLD
8.5%

Industrials

GAUG
8.1%
XYLD
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

GAUG
4.9%
XYLD
4.9%

Energy

GAUG
3.5%
XYLD
3.5%

Utilities

GAUG
2.3%
XYLD
2.3%

Real Estate

GAUG
1.9%
XYLD
1.9%

Basic Materials

GAUG
1.8%
XYLD
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAUG vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAUG
GAUG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAUG vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAUGXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.64

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

3.35

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.35

17.84

+0.51

GAUG vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAUG and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAUGXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.71

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.65

0.60

+1.04

Drawdowns

GAUG vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAUG drawdown since its inception was -10.08%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAUG and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAUGXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.08%

-33.46%

+23.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.01%

-5.29%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.15%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.73%

-3.72%

+2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

0.99%

-0.22%

Volatility

GAUG vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) is 0.75%, while Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) has a volatility of 0.88%. This indicates that GAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAUGXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

0.88%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.33%

5.37%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.70%

6.55%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.53%

11.22%

-3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.53%

14.21%

-6.68%

GAUG vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAUG vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

GAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.52%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAUG and XYLD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XYLD has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to GAUG (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAUG dropped -10.08% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

On 1-year performance, XYLD leads with 17.66% vs 14.06% for GAUG. On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GAUG has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 17.66% return vs 14.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GAUG.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.52%, compared with 0.00% for GAUG.

GAUG is categorized as Options Trading, while XYLD is Derivative Income. GAUG tracks S&P 500, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GAUG and 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAUG and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer