PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAUG vs. ^SP600
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GAUG vs. ^SP600 - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and S&P 600 (^SP600). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAUG achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly lower than ^SP600's 20.49% return.


GAUG

1D
0.25%
1M
0.88%
6M
5.60%
YTD
6.41%
1Y
11.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.17%

^SP600

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.75%
6M
14.16%
YTD
20.49%
1Y
33.67%
3Y*
11.49%
5Y*
5.69%
10Y*
9.21%
ALL TIME*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

^SP600

S&P 600
$181.92B$87.47B$30.78B
$437.85K$408.31K$567.67K

GAUG vs. ^SP600 - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August
6.41%11.28%11.78%5.94%
^SP600
S&P 600
20.49%4.23%6.82%9.73%

Correlation

The correlation between GAUG and ^SP600 is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2023

0.69

The correlation between GAUG and ^SP600 has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAUG vs. ^SP600 — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GAUG
GAUG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

^SP600
^SP600 Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
^SP600 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SP600 Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SP600 Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
^SP600 Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SP600 Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GAUG vs. ^SP600 - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and S&P 600 (^SP600). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GAUG^SP600Difference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.32

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

3.54

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.70

12.09

+2.62

GAUG vs. ^SP600 - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the ^SP600 Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAUG and ^SP600, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GAUG vs. ^SP600 - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAUG drawdown since its inception was -10.08%, smaller than the maximum ^SP600 drawdown of -59.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAUG and ^SP600.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAUG^SP600Difference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.08%

-59.17%

+49.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.01%

-8.94%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.98%

+1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-9.24%

+8.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

2.61%

-1.84%

Volatility

GAUG vs. ^SP600 - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) is 1.00%, while S&P 600 (^SP600) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that GAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^SP600 based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAUG^SP600Difference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

3.43%

-2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.29%

11.67%

-7.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.58%

17.40%

-11.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.38%

21.31%

-13.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.38%

23.14%

-15.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAUG and ^SP600 have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^SP600 has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to GAUG (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAUG dropped -10.08% vs ^SP600's -59.17%.

GAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAUG and ^SP600

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer