PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAUG vs. PUTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAUG vs. PUTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAUG achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly higher than PUTW's 4.26% return.


GAUG

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.59%
YTD
4.97%
6M
5.40%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PUTW

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.94%
YTD
4.26%
6M
4.65%
1Y
18.84%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
8.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAUG vs. PUTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August
4.97%11.28%11.78%5.84%
PUTW
WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
4.26%14.45%17.18%3.84%

Correlation

The correlation between GAUG and PUTW is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023

0.81

The correlation between GAUG and PUTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

GAUG vs. PUTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GAUG
PUTW

Technology

36.2%

-

Financial Services

11.9%
-0.0%

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

GAUG
36.2%
PUTW

-

Financial Services

GAUG
11.9%
PUTW
-0.0%

Communication Services

GAUG
10.9%
PUTW

-

Consumer Cyclical

GAUG
10.1%
PUTW

-

Healthcare

GAUG
8.4%
PUTW

-

Industrials

GAUG
8.1%
PUTW

-

Consumer Defensive

GAUG
4.9%
PUTW

-

Energy

GAUG
3.5%
PUTW

-

Utilities

GAUG
2.3%
PUTW

-

Real Estate

GAUG
1.9%
PUTW

-

Basic Materials

GAUG
1.8%
PUTW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAUG vs. PUTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAUG
GAUG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

PUTW
PUTW Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PUTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUTW Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PUTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUTW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAUG vs. PUTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAUGPUTWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

2.14

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.71

2.98

+0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.43

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

2.65

+0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.35

12.69

+5.66

GAUG vs. PUTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the PUTW Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAUG and PUTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAUGPUTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.14

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.65

0.65

+1.00

Drawdowns

GAUG vs. PUTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAUG drawdown since its inception was -10.08%, smaller than the maximum PUTW drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAUG and PUTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAUGPUTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.08%

-28.40%

+18.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.01%

-7.15%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.27%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.73%

-3.44%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

1.49%

-0.72%

Volatility

GAUG vs. PUTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) is 0.75%, while WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW) has a volatility of 0.90%. This indicates that GAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PUTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAUGPUTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

0.90%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.33%

7.00%

-2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.70%

8.86%

-3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.53%

12.13%

-4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.53%

13.22%

-5.69%

GAUG vs. PUTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PUTW's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAUG vs. PUTW - Dividend Comparison

GAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PUTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.06%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PUTW
WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
12.06%13.18%11.99%8.94%3.27%0.00%1.43%1.47%6.46%3.52%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAUG and PUTW have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PUTW has higher volatility (0.90%) compared to GAUG (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAUG dropped -10.08% vs PUTW's -28.40%.

GAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAUG and PUTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer