XDG7.DE vs. FLCH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDG7.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDG7.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select, while FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDG7.DE returned 4.63%/yr vs 6.45%/yr for FLCH. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDG7.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.

Performance

XDG7.DE vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XDG7.DE is traded in EUR, while FLCH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLCH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDG7.DE achieves a 34.27% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -7.16% return.

XDG7.DE

• 1D: -2.33%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 34.27%
• 6M: 33.11%
• 1Y: 73.03%
• 3Y*: 4.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLCH

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: -5.81%
• YTD: -7.16%
• 6M: -10.40%
• 1Y: 2.08%
• 3Y*: 6.45%
• 5Y*: -4.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDG7.DE vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XDG7.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C	34.27%	23.57%	-15.19%	-25.56%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-7.16%	16.82%	25.79%	-20.80%

Correlation

The correlation between XDG7.DE and FLCH is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023	0.37

Return for Risk

XDG7.DE vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDG7.DE

XDG7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 76
XDG7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
XDG7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
XDG7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 89
XDG7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
XDG7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 62

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 11
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDG7.DE vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDG7.DE	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	0.11	+2.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	0.29	+2.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.04	+0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.19	0.14	+4.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.86	0.29	+10.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDG7.DE vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDG7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDG7.DE and FLCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDG7.DE	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	0.11	+2.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.01	+0.05

Drawdowns

XDG7.DE vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDG7.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG7.DE and FLCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDG7.DE	FLCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.68%	-55.61%	+6.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.21%	-15.19%	-2.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.66%	-24.49%	-19.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.95%	-32.93%	+29.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.59%	-25.77%	-0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.64%	7.22%	-0.58%

Volatility

XDG7.DE vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 5.96%. This indicates that XDG7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDG7.DE	FLCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.88%	5.96%	+1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.49%	13.09%	+0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.00%	18.75%	+11.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.08%	28.32%	-4.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.08%	27.10%	-3.02%

XDG7.DE vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDG7.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDG7.DE vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

XDG7.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.59%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%
XDG7.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDG7.DE and FLCH in my portfolio?

XDG7.DE and FLCH have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDG7.DE or FLCH?

On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDG7.DE or FLCH?

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XDG7.DE.

What is the main difference between XDG7.DE and FLCH?

XDG7.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while FLCH is China Equities. XDG7.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDG7.DE and 0.19% for FLCH.