XDG7.DE vs. INRG.L

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L).

XDG7.DE and INRG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDG7.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select. It was launched on Jan 18, 2023. INRG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. It was launched on Jul 9, 2007. Both XDG7.DE and INRG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XDG7.DE vs. INRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XDG7.DE vs. INRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XDG7.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C	15.98%	23.57%	-15.19%	-25.56%
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	12.58%	27.72%	-20.75%	-21.72%

Different Trading Currencies

XDG7.DE is traded in EUR, while INRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INRG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDG7.DE achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly higher than INRG.L's 12.58% return.

XDG7.DE

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 6.29%
• YTD: 15.98%
• 6M: 22.10%
• 1Y: 51.91%
• 3Y*: -1.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INRG.L

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 3.79%
• YTD: 12.58%
• 6M: 17.40%
• 1Y: 50.03%
• 3Y*: -2.76%
• 5Y*: -4.20%
• 10Y*: 9.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDG7.DE vs. INRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDG7.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than INRG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

INRG.L

iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

XDG7.DE

Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C

Return for Risk

XDG7.DE vs. INRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDG7.DE

XDG7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 82
XDG7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
XDG7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
XDG7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 91
XDG7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
XDG7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66

INRG.L

INRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
INRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
INRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
INRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
INRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
INRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDG7.DE vs. INRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDG7.DE	INRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	2.11	-0.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	2.88	-0.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.35	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	4.29	-1.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.24	13.12	-4.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDG7.DE vs. INRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDG7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the INRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDG7.DE and INRG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDG7.DE	INRG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	2.11	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.13	-0.06	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between XDG7.DE and INRG.L is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XDG7.DE vs. INRG.L - Dividend Comparison

XDG7.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INRG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XDG7.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	1.57%	1.77%	1.58%	1.00%	0.62%	1.01%	0.61%	2.05%	3.68%	3.69%	3.65%	3.90%

Drawdowns

XDG7.DE vs. INRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDG7.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, smaller than the maximum INRG.L drawdown of -86.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDG7.DE and INRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDG7.DE	INRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.68%	-84.98%	+36.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.21%	-12.38%	-4.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-57.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-65.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.67%	-41.27%	+30.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.83%	-56.69%	+28.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.72%	4.19%	+2.53%

Volatility

XDG7.DE vs. INRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) is 4.69%, while iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that XDG7.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDG7.DE	INRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	7.31%	-2.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.56%	18.49%	+8.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.96%	23.57%	+7.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.13%	25.06%	-0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.13%	25.45%	-1.32%