XDEF vs. FXN
XDEF (Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF) and FXN (First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index, while FXN is a Energy Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Energy Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. XDEF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FXN.
Performance
XDEF vs. FXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XDEF
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- 6M
- -99.26%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXN
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 24.59%
- YTD
- 28.98%
- 1Y
- 41.26%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- 18.52%
- 10Y*
- 5.85%
XDEF vs. FXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | -99.18% |
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 28.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEF and FXN is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | -0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEF vs. FXN — Risk / Return Rank
XDEF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FXN
XDEF vs. FXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF) and First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDEF | FXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.78 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDEF vs. FXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEF drawdown since its inception was -99.30%, which is greater than FXN's maximum drawdown of -87.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEF and FXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEF | FXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.30% | -87.39% | -11.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.27% | -8.70% | -90.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.16% | -37.81% | -38.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.31% | — |
Volatility
XDEF vs. FXN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEF | FXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 139.53% | 23.23% | +116.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 139.53% | 28.80% | +110.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 139.53% | 34.82% | +104.71% |
XDEF vs. FXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FXN's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDEF vs. FXN - Dividend Comparison
XDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than FXN's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 1.70% | 2.53% | 2.50% | 3.09% | 2.28% | 0.87% | 4.71% | 1.47% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.05% | 2.36% |
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEF and FXN have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXN.
FXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.54% for XDEF.
XDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while FXN is Energy Equities. XDEF tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index, while FXN tracks StrataQuant Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDEF and 0.64% for FXN.
Find the right allocation for XDEF and FXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer