XDEF vs. FXN
XDEF (Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF) and FXN (First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index, while FXN is a Energy Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Energy Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. XDEF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FXN.
Performance
XDEF vs. FXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XDEF
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXN
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 36.03%
- 6M
- 30.89%
- 1Y
- 52.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- 17.30%
- 10Y*
- 6.52%
XDEF vs. FXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | -99.17% |
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 32.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEF and FXN is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEF vs. FXN — Risk / Return Rank
XDEF
FXN
XDEF vs. FXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF) and First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEF | FXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.64 | 0.06 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
XDEF vs. FXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEF drawdown since its inception was -99.30%, which is greater than FXN's maximum drawdown of -87.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEF and FXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEF | FXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.30% | -87.39% | -11.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.26% | -3.71% | -95.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.45% | -37.99% | -32.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.17% | — |
Volatility
XDEF vs. FXN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEF | FXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 157.63% | 23.55% | +134.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 157.63% | 28.92% | +128.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 157.63% | 35.00% | +122.63% |
XDEF vs. FXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FXN's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDEF vs. FXN - Dividend Comparison
XDEF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 1.76% | 2.53% | 2.50% | 3.09% | 2.28% | 0.87% | 4.71% | 1.47% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.05% | 2.36% |
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEF and FXN have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXN.
FXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.00% for XDEF.
XDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while FXN is Energy Equities. XDEF tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index, while FXN tracks StrataQuant Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDEF and 0.64% for FXN.
Find the right allocation for XDEF and FXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer