PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEF vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEF vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XDEF

1D
-0.23%
1M
-2.40%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNO

1D
-1.35%
1M
-22.65%
YTD
50.21%
6M
47.81%
1Y
38.79%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
17.15%
10Y*
11.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEF vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDEF and BNO is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026

-0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEF vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEF vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDEFBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

XDEF vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDEF vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEF drawdown since its inception was -99.30%, which is greater than BNO's maximum drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEF and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEFBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.30%

-87.06%

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.26%

-29.25%

-70.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.02%

-40.10%

-32.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.28%

Volatility

XDEF vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEFBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

148.20%

41.67%

+106.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

148.20%

35.65%

+112.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

148.20%

36.68%

+111.52%

XDEF vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDEF vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

XDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


XDEF and BNO have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

XDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

XDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while BNO is Oil & Gas. XDEF tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index, while BNO tracks Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDEF and 1.00% for BNO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEF and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer