XDEF vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XDEF (Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. XDEF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

XDEF vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XDEF

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: -2.01%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 90.47%
• 6M: 86.00%
• 1Y: 91.89%
• 3Y*: 27.93%
• 5Y*: 24.16%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEF vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF	-99.17%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	90.94%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEF and BNO is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026	-0.37

Return for Risk

XDEF vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEF vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDEF	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.64	0.14	-0.78

Drawdowns

XDEF vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEF drawdown since its inception was -99.30%, which is greater than BNO's maximum drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEF and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDEF	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.30%	-87.06%	-12.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.87%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.26%	-10.29%	-88.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.45%	-40.17%	-30.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XDEF	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	157.63%	41.46%	+116.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	157.63%	35.38%	+122.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	157.63%	36.68%	+120.95%

XDEF vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDEF vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEF nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDEF and BNO in my portfolio?

XDEF and BNO have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDEF or BNO?

On fees, XDEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDEF or BNO?

XDEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDEF or BNO?

XDEF and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XDEF and BNO?

XDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while BNO is Oil & Gas. XDEF tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDEF and 0.90% for BNO.