XDEF vs. BNO
XDEF (Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. XDEF charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.
Performance
XDEF vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XDEF
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNO
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -22.65%
- YTD
- 50.21%
- 6M
- 47.81%
- 1Y
- 38.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 17.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
XDEF vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | -99.17% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 50.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEF and BNO is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | -0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEF vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
XDEF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BNO
XDEF vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDEF | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDEF vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEF drawdown since its inception was -99.30%, which is greater than BNO's maximum drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEF and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEF | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.30% | -87.06% | -12.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -29.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.26% | -29.25% | -70.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.02% | -40.10% | -32.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.28% | — |
Volatility
XDEF vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEF | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.20% | 41.67% | +106.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.20% | 35.65% | +112.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.20% | 36.68% | +111.52% |
XDEF vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDEF vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
XDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% |
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEF and BNO have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.
XDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
XDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while BNO is Oil & Gas. XDEF tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index, while BNO tracks Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDEF and 1.00% for BNO.
Find the right allocation for XDEF and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer