XDAT vs. MRNY
XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) and MRNY (YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while MRNY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XDAT returned -3.13% vs 58.68% for MRNY. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDAT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MRNY.
Performance
XDAT vs. MRNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly lower than MRNY's 91.45% return.
XDAT
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- -3.13%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- —
MRNY
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 50.63%
- YTD
- 91.45%
- 1Y
- 58.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDAT vs. MRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | -0.59% | 1.87% | 16.54% | 22.73% |
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 91.45% | -35.72% | -59.32% | 18.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDAT and MRNY is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2023 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDAT vs. MRNY — Risk / Return Rank
XDAT
MRNY
XDAT vs. MRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDAT | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.22 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 1.87 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 3.61 | -3.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDAT vs. MRNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, smaller than the maximum MRNY drawdown of -82.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and MRNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDAT | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.87% | -82.15% | +27.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | -31.53% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.83% | -59.70% | +42.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.78% | -52.97% | +27.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.51% | 16.33% | -1.82% |
Volatility
XDAT vs. MRNY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) is 7.31%, while YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) has a volatility of 20.13%. This indicates that XDAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDAT | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 20.13% | -12.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.64% | 39.62% | -18.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.63% | 52.93% | -28.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.64% | 51.52% | -21.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.39% | 51.52% | -22.13% |
XDAT vs. MRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MRNY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDAT vs. MRNY - Dividend Comparison
XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 87.26% | 145.98% | 178.49% | 1.75% |
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDAT and MRNY have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRNY has higher volatility (20.13%) compared to XDAT (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDAT dropped -54.87% vs MRNY's -82.15%.
On 1-year performance, MRNY leads with 58.68% vs -3.13% for XDAT. On fees, XDAT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, XDAT has been the lower-risk option at 7.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MRNY has performed better with a 58.68% return vs -3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XDAT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MRNY.
MRNY has the higher dividend yield at 87.26%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.
XDAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while MRNY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.99% for MRNY.
MRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XDAT and MRNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer