PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDAT vs. LEGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDAT vs. LEGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than LEGR's 12.39% return.


XDAT

1D
-3.31%
1M
10.82%
YTD
0.92%
6M
-1.59%
1Y
-1.19%
3Y*
12.16%
5Y*
1.26%
10Y*

LEGR

1D
-1.50%
1M
7.23%
YTD
12.39%
6M
15.64%
1Y
30.64%
3Y*
23.83%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDAT vs. LEGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XDAT
Franklin Exponential Data ETF
0.92%1.87%16.54%45.77%-45.71%10.86%
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
12.39%30.83%16.25%22.79%-19.01%12.39%

Correlation

The correlation between XDAT and LEGR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2021

0.63

The correlation between XDAT and LEGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDAT vs. LEGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDAT
LEGR

Technology

53.3%
27.3%

Communication Services

35.1%
8.9%

Real Estate

5.7%

-

Financial Services

4.1%
42.5%

Healthcare

2.6%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
8.5%

Industrials

0.5%
5.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.4%

Energy

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Technology

XDAT
53.3%
LEGR
27.3%

Communication Services

XDAT
35.1%
LEGR
8.9%

Real Estate

XDAT
5.7%
LEGR

-

Financial Services

XDAT
4.1%
LEGR
42.5%

Healthcare

XDAT
2.6%
LEGR
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XDAT
1.3%
LEGR
8.5%

Industrials

XDAT
0.5%
LEGR
5.6%

Basic Materials

XDAT

-

LEGR
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

XDAT

-

LEGR
1.4%

Energy

XDAT

-

LEGR
0.8%

Utilities

XDAT

-

LEGR
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDAT vs. LEGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDAT
XDAT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

LEGR
LEGR Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LEGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEGR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LEGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEGR Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDAT vs. LEGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDATLEGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.40

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

2.96

-3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

11.21

-11.30

XDAT vs. LEGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the LEGR Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDAT and LEGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDATLEGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

2.26

-2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.70

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.60

-0.57

Drawdowns

XDAT vs. LEGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than LEGR's maximum drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and LEGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDATLEGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.87%

-36.12%

-18.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.56%

-10.40%

-19.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.56%

-14.25%

-15.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.87%

-31.45%

-23.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.57%

-1.50%

-14.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.91%

-6.61%

-19.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.78%

2.74%

+11.04%

Volatility

XDAT vs. LEGR - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) at 4.93%. This indicates that XDAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDATLEGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.56%

4.93%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.27%

11.22%

+8.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.56%

13.62%

+9.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.45%

16.96%

+12.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.43%

20.31%

+9.12%

XDAT vs. LEGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than LEGR's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDAT vs. LEGR - Dividend Comparison

XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
1.67%1.84%2.40%2.56%2.64%1.80%0.95%2.04%1.30%
XDAT
Franklin Exponential Data ETF
0.00%0.00%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDAT and LEGR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XDAT has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to LEGR (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDAT dropped -54.87% vs LEGR's -36.12%.

On 5-year performance, LEGR leads with 11.82% vs 1.26% for XDAT. On fees, XDAT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, LEGR has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LEGR has performed better with a 11.82% return vs 1.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDAT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.

LEGR has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.

XDAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while LEGR is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.65% for LEGR.

LEGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDAT and LEGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer