XDAT vs. BCI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while BCI is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDAT returned 1.26%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for BCI. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDAT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for BCI.

Performance

XDAT vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 26.68% return.

XDAT

• 1D: -3.31%
• 1M: 10.82%
• YTD: 0.92%
• 6M: -1.59%
• 1Y: -1.19%
• 3Y*: 12.16%
• 5Y*: 1.26%
• 10Y*: —

BCI

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: 26.68%
• 6M: 25.55%
• 1Y: 38.68%
• 3Y*: 15.96%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDAT vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF	0.92%	1.87%	16.54%	45.77%	-45.71%	10.86%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	26.68%	15.07%	5.47%	-8.79%	15.09%	21.57%

Correlation

The correlation between XDAT and BCI is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2021	0.13

The correlation between XDAT and BCI shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDAT vs. BCI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDAT	BCI
Technology	53.3%	-
Communication Services	35.1%	-
Real Estate	5.7%	-
Financial Services	4.1%	100.0%
Healthcare	2.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.3%	-
Industrials	0.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XDAT vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDAT

XDAT Risk / Return Rank: 8
XDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
XDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
XDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 8
XDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
XDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 8

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 71
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDAT vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDAT	BCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	2.30	-2.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.09	2.92	-2.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.41	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.04	5.10	-5.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.09	13.14	-13.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDAT vs. BCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the BCI Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDAT and BCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDAT	BCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05	2.30	-2.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.66	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.48	-0.45

Drawdowns

XDAT vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and BCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDAT	BCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.87%	-32.69%	-22.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.56%	-7.61%	-21.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.56%	-11.38%	-18.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.87%	-26.50%	-28.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.57%	-4.52%	-11.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.91%	-12.00%	-13.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.78%	2.95%	+10.83%

Volatility

XDAT vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) at 5.16%. This indicates that XDAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDAT	BCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.56%	5.16%	+3.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.27%	14.80%	+4.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.56%	16.92%	+6.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.45%	16.82%	+12.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.43%	15.65%	+13.78%

XDAT vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDAT vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	13.01%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDAT and BCI in my portfolio?

XDAT and BCI have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XDAT or BCI?

XDAT has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to BCI (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDAT dropped -54.87% vs BCI's -32.69%.

Which ETF is better, XDAT or BCI?

On 5-year performance, BCI leads with 11.07% vs 1.26% for XDAT. On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BCI has been the lower-risk option at 5.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XDAT or BCI?

Over the 5-year period, BCI has performed better with a 11.07% return vs 1.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDAT or BCI?

BCI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XDAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDAT or BCI?

BCI has the higher dividend yield at 13.01%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.

What is the main difference between XDAT and BCI?

XDAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.25% for BCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.