XCX4.L vs. CPJ1.L
XCX4.L (Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C) and CPJ1.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - XCX4.L tracks the MSCI Thailand NR THB while CPJ1.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XCX4.L returned 5.61%/yr vs 8.53%/yr for CPJ1.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCX4.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CPJ1.L.
Performance
XCX4.L vs. CPJ1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCX4.L achieves a 29.73% return, which is significantly higher than CPJ1.L's 8.83% return. Over the past 10 years, XCX4.L has underperformed CPJ1.L with an annualized return of 5.61%, while CPJ1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.53% annualized return.
XCX4.L
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 7.89%
- YTD
- 29.73%
- 6M
- 30.03%
- 1Y
- 55.99%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 5.24%
- 10Y*
- 5.61%
CPJ1.L
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 9.62%
- 1Y
- 17.48%
- 3Y*
- 10.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
XCX4.L vs. CPJ1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCX4.L Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C | 29.73% | -0.00% | 1.83% | -16.15% | 16.42% | -0.57% | -13.81% | 3.68% | 0.70% | 21.77% |
CPJ1.L iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc | 8.83% | 12.05% | 6.89% | 0.15% | 4.86% | 5.71% | 3.46% | 14.30% | -5.53% | 15.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCX4.L and CPJ1.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2011 | 0.35 |
The correlation between XCX4.L and CPJ1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XCX4.L vs. CPJ1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XCX4.L
CPJ1.L
Industrials
Energy
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
-
Industrials
XCX4.L
CPJ1.L
Energy
XCX4.L
CPJ1.L
Communication Services
XCX4.L
CPJ1.L
Financial Services
XCX4.L
CPJ1.L
Healthcare
XCX4.L
CPJ1.L
Consumer Defensive
XCX4.L
CPJ1.L
Utilities
XCX4.L
CPJ1.L
Basic Materials
XCX4.L
CPJ1.L
Real Estate
XCX4.L
CPJ1.L
Consumer Cyclical
XCX4.L
CPJ1.L
Technology
XCX4.L
-
CPJ1.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCX4.L vs. CPJ1.L — Risk / Return Rank
XCX4.L
CPJ1.L
XCX4.L vs. CPJ1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCX4.L | CPJ1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.29 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.91 | 2.41 | +2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.83 | 7.27 | +7.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCX4.L | CPJ1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 1.59 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.44 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.54 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.45 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
XCX4.L vs. CPJ1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCX4.L drawdown since its inception was -44.14%, which is greater than CPJ1.L's maximum drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCX4.L and CPJ1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCX4.L | CPJ1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.14% | -32.49% | -11.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -7.23% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.34% | -17.15% | -11.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.52% | -17.61% | -18.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.14% | -32.49% | -11.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.61% | -2.97% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.85% | -6.90% | -10.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.76% | 2.40% | +1.36% |
Volatility
XCX4.L vs. CPJ1.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) at 3.70%. This indicates that XCX4.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPJ1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCX4.L | CPJ1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 3.70% | +2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.46% | 8.65% | +7.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.07% | 10.99% | +10.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 13.74% | +5.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 15.93% | +5.95% |
XCX4.L vs. CPJ1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCX4.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CPJ1.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCX4.L vs. CPJ1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCX4.L nor CPJ1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCX4.L and CPJ1.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CPJ1.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CPJ1.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCX4.L.
XCX4.L tracks MSCI Thailand NR THB, while CPJ1.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCX4.L and 0.20% for CPJ1.L.
Find the right allocation for XCX4.L and CPJ1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer