PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCX4.L vs. HMXJ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCX4.L vs. HMXJ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L) and HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCX4.L achieves a 29.73% return, which is significantly higher than HMXJ.L's 8.91% return. Over the past 10 years, XCX4.L has underperformed HMXJ.L with an annualized return of 5.61%, while HMXJ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.45% annualized return.


XCX4.L

1D
0.91%
1M
7.89%
YTD
29.73%
6M
30.03%
1Y
55.99%
3Y*
7.37%
5Y*
5.24%
10Y*
5.61%

HMXJ.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
0.55%
YTD
8.91%
6M
9.65%
1Y
17.57%
3Y*
10.62%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
8.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCX4.L vs. HMXJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCX4.L
Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C
29.73%-0.00%1.83%-16.15%16.42%-0.57%-13.81%3.68%0.70%21.77%
HMXJ.L
HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF
8.91%12.37%6.43%0.38%5.35%5.41%3.21%13.89%-5.45%14.45%

Correlation

The correlation between XCX4.L and HMXJ.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2010

0.37

The correlation between XCX4.L and HMXJ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XCX4.L vs. HMXJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XCX4.L
HMXJ.L

Industrials

35.6%
8.5%

Energy

14.5%
2.7%

Communication Services

12.7%
2.6%

Financial Services

10.1%
45.1%

Healthcare

8.0%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
3.0%

Utilities

6.6%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.2%
16.1%

Real Estate

3.2%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
6.3%

Technology

-

1.0%

Industrials

XCX4.L
35.6%
HMXJ.L
8.5%

Energy

XCX4.L
14.5%
HMXJ.L
2.7%

Communication Services

XCX4.L
12.7%
HMXJ.L
2.6%

Financial Services

XCX4.L
10.1%
HMXJ.L
45.1%

Healthcare

XCX4.L
8.0%
HMXJ.L
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

XCX4.L
7.9%
HMXJ.L
3.0%

Utilities

XCX4.L
6.6%
HMXJ.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

XCX4.L
4.2%
HMXJ.L
16.1%

Real Estate

XCX4.L
3.2%
HMXJ.L
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XCX4.L
1.7%
HMXJ.L
6.3%

Technology

XCX4.L

-

HMXJ.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCX4.L vs. HMXJ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCX4.L
XCX4.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XCX4.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCX4.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCX4.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XCX4.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCX4.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

HMXJ.L
HMXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
HMXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HMXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCX4.L vs. HMXJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L) and HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCX4.LHMXJ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.29

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.91

2.46

+2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.83

7.37

+7.47

XCX4.L vs. HMXJ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCX4.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the HMXJ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCX4.L and HMXJ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCX4.LHMXJ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

1.61

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.44

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.55

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.42

-0.11

Drawdowns

XCX4.L vs. HMXJ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCX4.L drawdown since its inception was -44.14%, which is greater than HMXJ.L's maximum drawdown of -32.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCX4.L and HMXJ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCX4.LHMXJ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.14%

-32.30%

-11.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.35%

-7.12%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.34%

-17.47%

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.52%

-17.65%

-18.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.14%

-32.30%

-11.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-2.76%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.85%

-6.74%

-11.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

2.38%

+1.38%

Volatility

XCX4.L vs. HMXJ.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L) at 3.58%. This indicates that XCX4.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMXJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCX4.LHMXJ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

3.58%

+2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.46%

8.32%

+8.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.07%

10.89%

+10.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.80%

13.80%

+5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

16.12%

+5.76%

XCX4.L vs. HMXJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCX4.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HMXJ.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCX4.L vs. HMXJ.L - Dividend Comparison

XCX4.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMXJ.L
HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF
3.02%3.43%3.80%4.13%3.79%2.71%3.05%3.88%3.80%3.23%3.32%4.03%
XCX4.L
Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCX4.L and HMXJ.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HMXJ.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HMXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCX4.L.

XCX4.L tracks MSCI Thailand NR THB, while HMXJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCX4.L and 0.40% for HMXJ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCX4.L and HMXJ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer